This looks good to me!

In the future, you don't have to get as detailed with the sidewalks at the corners. You can just square them off, usually where the tactile pavement is located. That makes the crossings a little easier to add later.

Keep in mind that the aerial imagery has some jitter, so future updates could throw off the alignment again. When you're aligning buildings, "pretty close" is sometimes better than matching the satellite exactly. This can been seen if you enable the Ohio specific imagery layers when editing - they're slightly different from Bing's aerial imagery.

Looks good to me!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171020145

Looks good to me!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171020145

The lodge and campground are for members of the league, so I think access=private is probably appropriate.

This looks okay to me. Welcome to OSM!

Normally the area that is marked as the 'building' will just follow the foot print of the building itself. It's okay for it to be detached from the road, it's not supposed to cover the entire property.

It looks otherwise okay to me!

also, I removed the railway that was marked on there. It is nowhere in sight.