Hello. Please refrain from adding advertising into the description of places. I will go ahead fix that & errors in the time formatting.

Hi, I have reverted this changeset for the following reasons:

1. The renaming was only done for the alternative name, in which the renaming is partially complete, but causes discrepancies.
2. Name of the road was correctly labeled according to addresses. (src: https://geohub.wilcotx.gov/datasets/WILCO::county-web-address-public/explore?location=30.631903%2C-97.689912%2C17.93)

changeset/171895000

Hi! It seems you have accidentally deleted an important tag on way/176832712, so I went ahead and fixed the error.

I'd personally recommend reviewing what you're submitting before sending it off, especially on smaller changesets.

Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I'd just like to inform you that Esri World Imagery has the most up-to-date data in the Williamson County area as of right now.

You can change the aerial imagery layer by pressing B (or clicking the layered icon on the right side) in the iD editor menu.

Edits partially reverted by changeset/165175635

While I am not saying that you are evading questions/comments intentionally, you seem to have a tendency of not responding to them.

There are 14 other changesets that have at least one comment on them, some of which being:
changeset/139918149 - Asks for sources, sees you deleting and recreating ways
changeset/131510629 - Comments on making sure you add proper sources
changeset/144793256 - Was reverted due to the roads not being open yet, along with 35 ignored iD editor warnings
changeset/154447260 - Was reverted similar to c144793256, with 23 ignored iD warnings.
changeset/107987780 - This changeset was advised that it caused an issue with a relation
A full list of comments on changesets you made can be found at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6802016

You have acknowledged and/or responded to none of these and have continued to make errors that the iD editor and contributors were attempting to alert you of.

I don't know if you don't receive messages from OSM via email, or if you know this feature even exists. I have attempted to get in contact with you directly through OSM's own platform, yet you are still yet to respond 72+ hours later.

I'm not trying to discourage you from mapping on OSM, it's a service you are aiding by updating things! However I find your edits to be low quality, not properly reviewed, and not sourced well. Even basic sources such as "Survey" or "Aerial Imagery" could negate some the comments, yet you appear to not being doing any of such to try and improve.

I have just sent a PM to the original editor through OSM.

Thanks for the edits on the toll roads, however I have concerns regarding this edit.

1. I personally don't agree with the neighboring roads of the toll road being reclassified as a "secondary road".
It would likely be better for them to be primary roads as per highway=primary#International_equivalence

2a. What are the sources of this edit? As far as I'm aware, the imagery you used is not available in the area you mapped, and you have no sources you put in yourself.

2b. Why did you delete ways? Again, the imagery doesn't appear to be served in the area you mapped, and is likely outdated if it was available. How did you know that these didn't exist?

3. I find it suspicious that the roads you've deleted are the same roads that aren't mapped on Google Maps. Could be coincidence, but I don't find it likely.

Hi!

I'm simply specifying what type of parking is allowed within the parking spots of this area and deleting old parking spots that no longer exist. (If there is no difference between a parking spot being labeled "Normal" and a parking spots with no data or I've incorrectly tagged these, please let me know!)

This is not an import as stated in my original commit, and was determined using aerial captures, which was made easier due to accessibility parking spots already being labeled as such.

If there are any issues, please let me know, I only wish to provide helpful details.