mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145160284 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145129253 | about 2 years ago | Hi Paul, I've actually never been to Florence. But still nice to meet you here. I actually write all my changeset comments by hand. Even though I can understand the reasoning behind your large changesets, I still think it makes sense to restrict them regionally. I work with OSMCha and Achavi and there such large changesets (especially in the quantity as in your case) generate an IMHO completely unnecessary background noise and thus only complicate the locally concentrated work during the review.
What do you think? Wishing you a wonderful rest of the Advent season, happy holidays and a happy new year.
|
| 145116491 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145142129 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145129253 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139195 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139384 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139575 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139593 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139778 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145139950 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145089588 | about 2 years ago | Hi, are you sure about the position here? There's only a residential building here, not a pizzeria. |
| 145065560 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145056736 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145061068 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 145026853 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • and the most important one: upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 130777686 | about 2 years ago | Guten Tag,
|
| 144971284 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 144969005 | about 2 years ago | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 144968605 | about 2 years ago | Hi, the bank is now duplicated. It was already here: node/810366439 |