mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 140813409 | over 2 years ago | But then it would not be "access=no" but "vehicle=no", right? |
| 141032844 | over 2 years ago | Hi, bezüglich der Änderung der SAC-Skala hier: way/129023299 Sind dort Stellen mit Seilen oder Ketten gesichert, braucht man die Hände für das Gleichgewicht und existieren dort Geröllflächen oder Stellen mit Absturzgefahr?
|
| 141028291 | over 2 years ago | Hi, are you sure the surface of the helipad is cobblestone?
|
| 140811929 | over 2 years ago | Added the suitable relations: changeset/141116394
|
| 140463240 | over 2 years ago | Hi jeka, hatten wir nicht besprochen, dass ein landuse keine Adresse hat?
|
| 140487184 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I've partially reverted this changeset as "fee=yes" is not correct here as there is already a conditional restrictions therefore.
|
| 140527127 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 140807747 | over 2 years ago | Danke!
|
| 140811929 | over 2 years ago | Hi, there is no speed camera at this position. Are the coordinates correct?
|
| 140813409 | over 2 years ago | Hi, what exactly is the signage here?
|
| 140871461 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 140553876 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 140546178 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141107357 | over 2 years ago | Hi, warum schreibst du in der Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes immer nur "Details added"? Hier wäre doch "Viehgitter am Netschelweg ergänzt" viel passender.
|
| 141107005 | over 2 years ago | Hi, die offizielle ref laut Datenblatt der Landesregierung lautet 48.074 (https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/48_Laterns/48.074.pdf). Stimmen deine Änderungen? Dann wäre das offizielle Datenblatt falsch.
|
| 140990036 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141102258 | over 2 years ago | Hi, laut dem offiziellen Datenblatt des Wegweisers von der Landesregierung ist die ref "64.022". Siehe https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/64_Rankweil/64.022.pdf
|
| 141102798 | over 2 years ago | Hi, ist der Weg hier über die volle Länge (523 Meter) eine Furt? (way/1206832568)
|
| 141081882 | over 2 years ago | Hi, ist der offizielle Name wirklich "P.2801"?
|
| 141094885 | over 2 years ago | Abfrage über: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A7o |