mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141268406 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141270980 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141271209 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141274899 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141274932 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141274943 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
|
| 141275470 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141275702 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141276012 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141063468 | over 2 years ago | Da müsste man den Grundstückseigner nochmal fragen, ob das Verbot nun für alle gilt und nur ihn/sie selbst ausnimmt oder ob alle Landwirte der Umgebung den Weg mitbenutzen dürfen. Ob No oder private ist Geschmackssache, am Ende bedeutet es das gleiche für den Router. |
| 141063468 | over 2 years ago | "agricultural" sagt ja nicht aus, dass "dieser eine Landwirt" den Weg verwenden darf, sondern *alle* Landwirte dies tun dürfen. Und von der Beschreibung her gehe ich nicht davon aus, dass das Schild als "Alle Personen verboten ausgenommen Landwirte" zu verstehen ist. Oder was meint ihr? |
| 141063468 | over 2 years ago | Dürfen den Weg alle landwirtschaftlichen Personen verwenden? Beispiel: Ich bin Landwirtin und möchte den Weg nutzen (ob zu Fuß oder mit meinem Traktor spielt bei "access" ja keine Rolle).
|
| 141167436 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141201471 | over 2 years ago | Hi, du hast hier aus versehen den "highway"-Tag entfernt. Ich habe diesen wieder ergänzt. Das "access=no" ist bereits ausreichend für die Sperrung. |
| 141207199 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141217083 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141224490 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 141242975 | over 2 years ago | Dankeschön! Habe auch die anderen Wege dort noch angepasst, das ist mir mit Relatify wohl passiert.
|
| 141063468 | over 2 years ago | Hallo, ich habe deine Änderungen revertiert und access=no ergänzt. Siehe dazu bitte: osm.wiki/User:Nakaner/Positionspapier_Geheimhaltung#Warum_werden_diese_Objekte_erfasst?_Warum_werden_sie_nicht_gel%C3%B6scht?
|
| 117891600 | over 2 years ago | Hi, du hast hier übrigens diesen Knoten gelöscht und damit die Straße um 21 Meter unterbrochen. Siehe: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1AfU
|