OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
140813409 over 2 years ago

But then it would not be "access=no" but "vehicle=no", right?

141032844 over 2 years ago

Hi, bezüglich der Änderung der SAC-Skala hier: way/129023299

Sind dort Stellen mit Seilen oder Ketten gesichert, braucht man die Hände für das Gleichgewicht und existieren dort Geröllflächen oder Stellen mit Absturzgefahr?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141032844

141028291 over 2 years ago

Hi, are you sure the surface of the helipad is cobblestone?
See: surface=cobblestone
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141028291

140811929 over 2 years ago

Added the suitable relations: changeset/141116394
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140811929

140463240 over 2 years ago

Hi jeka, hatten wir nicht besprochen, dass ein landuse keine Adresse hat?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140463240

140487184 over 2 years ago

Hi, I've partially reverted this changeset as "fee=yes" is not correct here as there is already a conditional restrictions therefore.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140487184

140527127 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140807747 over 2 years ago

Danke!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140807747

140811929 over 2 years ago

Hi, there is no speed camera at this position. Are the coordinates correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140811929

140813409 over 2 years ago

Hi, what exactly is the signage here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140813409

140871461 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140553876 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140546178 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

141107357 over 2 years ago

Hi, warum schreibst du in der Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes immer nur "Details added"? Hier wäre doch "Viehgitter am Netschelweg ergänzt" viel passender.
Schau dir auch mal diese Seite an: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

141107005 over 2 years ago

Hi, die offizielle ref laut Datenblatt der Landesregierung lautet 48.074 (https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/48_Laterns/48.074.pdf). Stimmen deine Änderungen? Dann wäre das offizielle Datenblatt falsch.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107005

140990036 over 2 years ago

Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

141102258 over 2 years ago

Hi, laut dem offiziellen Datenblatt des Wegweisers von der Landesregierung ist die ref "64.022". Siehe https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/64_Rankweil/64.022.pdf
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141102258

141102798 over 2 years ago

Hi, ist der Weg hier über die volle Länge (523 Meter) eine Furt? (way/1206832568)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141102798

141081882 over 2 years ago

Hi, ist der offizielle Name wirklich "P.2801"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141081882

141094885 over 2 years ago

Abfrage über: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A7o