Hi Sillililli, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. I think you misunderstood the instructions. You should free draw a closed line around a group of buildings with the attribute landuse=residential. Then map the individual buildings as building=yes (let them not cross the residential border). And place a node in the middle of the group with the attribute place=hamlet or place=village. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117298830

Hi Demetrios, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The building you mapped is well done as to the location. But pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always map buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Then you are good. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117299412

Hi youngmapper, thanks for mapping. Unfortunately, there are a few issues here. You mapped a road, but forgot to assign a tag to it. Some buildings are tagged as building=building, they should be building=yes. Also, please pay attention to the squarness of their corners. Fortunately, there are also buildings that are mapped well. Thanks and regards, Martien HOT validator.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117297909

Hi MBSage, waterways run always towards a bigger stream. You mapped 2 of them running the other way round. Also one of them doesn't connect to the bigger waterway.
As to the buildings, please keep an eye on the squarness of the corners. But besides that, they are all well placed. Thanks and please keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117209036

Hi DomR10, you asked for a review on this changeset. There are a few issues. First, a few buildings are overlapping each other. Second, some buildings have non square corners. And last, a group of closely located buildings are mapped as one building, while they should be mapped each separately. However, the majority of the buildings is well mapped. Thanks for your time and please keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117209099

Hi, you requested a review of this changeset. This looks excellent. Thanks, keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117211316

Hi, welcome to HOT OSM. You requested a review of your mappings. I looked at a few of the mappings you did in project 12080, especially as to the buildings. The outlines are correct and in general the corners are square. I did see a few however with unsquare corners, so that they look more like a trapeze than a rectangle. So in general well done, and keep an eye on these corners. Thanks for your time and please keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117167328

Nogmaals dank.

Ik ben gaan kijken, het is iets gecompliceerder.

Of de gebouwvleugel 1 geheel vormt met het aan de Kan. Faberstr. gelegen appartementendeel is van buiten af (gekeken door het raam) lastig te zien. De (erg schematische) plattegrond bij de ingang doet vermoeden van wel. En ik denk dat mijn mapping wat dat betreft correct is.

Het restaurant is onderdeel van zorgcentrum Aqua Viva. Maar ook toegankelijk voor "buurtbewoners". Zie https://www.aquaviva.nl/open-naar-de-wijk/

Zo te zien is alleen het westelijke gedeelte van de gebouwvleugel restaurant. Het oostelijk gedeelte lijkt een bibliotheek oid.

Ik kan eens een keer naar binnen gaan en vragen hoe het zit. Nu was alles gesloten.

Ik heb de door jouw voorgestelde tagging alvast ingevoerd. Leek me iig beter als de huidige tagging.

Hallo Famlam, hartelijk dank voor de feedback.

W.b gebouwscheiding: wat je aangeeft, daar heb ik inderdaad geen rekening mee gehouden. Dat ga ik daarom nog eens ter plaatse controlleren. En goed dat je me attent maakt op die BAG import, was ik me niet van bewust.

W.b. restaurant: ik snap nu dat dat niet goed is. Maar ik zie nergens in de key:addr wiki dat je een naam of functie aan de adrestag/node kunt koppelen. Ik vond wel amenity=restaurant dat eventueel building=apartments kan vervangen. Aan die amenity kun je ook een name="Restaurant De Drukkerij" geven.

Wat denk jij?

Hoi Eggie, dank je wel voor de feedback.

Alhoewel ik weet van de schuin genomen gebouwen die je niet volgens het dak moet mappen is het bij mij toch niet helemaal goed gegaan.

Ik denk dat ik in de war ben geraakt door alle overige aanwezige objecten. Dat ben ik niet zo gewend als HOT mapper.

Vooral die adrespunten, die zal ik voortaan maar wegfilteren.

Hi, please stop mapping this way? This seems like vandalism and is degrading the quality of the map. In the end vulnerable people on the ground will suffer. Thanks for your cooperation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114677183

Hi, please stop mapping this way? This seems like vandalism and is degrading the quality of the map. In the end vulnerable people on the ground will suffer. Thanks for your cooperation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114678285

Hi, please stop mapping this way? This seems like vandalism and is degrading the quality of the map. In the end vulnerable people on the ground will suffer. Thanks for your cooperation.

Reviewing your mappings here i noticed a few issues. The buildings you mapped do not have square corners. Also when mapping roads they should be connected to each other forming a closed network.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ

Thanks so much for your contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114751394

Hi, welcome to HOT. Reviewing your mappings here i noticed a few issues. The buildings you mapped do not have square corners. Also when mapping roads they should be connected to each other forming a closed network.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info.

-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY

-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ --

Thanks so much for your contribution.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114751291

Hi, you requested a review on this changeset. It looks good. The buildings are correctly positioned with nice square corners. Thanks and please keep up the good work.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114714139

Hi Zampachm, thanks for mapping. One remark, i see you sometimes delete a building that is incorrectly mapped. And map a new correct building in its place. It is better though to not delete it and move and retrace it until it is good. Generally speaking, deleting features that do exist is considered vandalism. Thanks again and please keep mapping, you are doing well.

Hi Zampachm, thanks for mapping. One remark, i see you sometimes delete a building that is incorrectly mapped. And map a new correct building in its place. It is better though to not delete it and move and retrace it until it is good. Generally speaking, deleting features that do exist can be considered vandalism. Thanks again and please keep mapping, you are doing well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114340579

Hi Elisia, there is an issue here to buildings partly covered by trees not traced completely.

See also my comment on https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10426/tasks/?search=141
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113620051

Please forget what i said about project #537. This was a mistake from my side. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Hi, welcome to HOT. Good to have you and thanks for your time.

Before you proceed with mapping, please watch these 2 interesting and educational videos about mapping buildings. It only takes a few minutes of your time but will enhance the quality of your mappings.

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Another tip: the project you are mapping here (#537) dates back from 2014. There is a good chance it is abandoned by the creators. To be on the safe side, please pick projects from 2020 or later.

Thanks for your cooperation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112860848