Do you have a picture?

Hi,
Could you explain why you've added this ATM while questioning yourself whether it really exists?
node/10057812263

Hi,
I think you accidentally made a mistake here: note/3658639

Hey,

please try to create smaller changesets when possible. This will make it much easier for others to understand what you're doing.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hi,
Thanks for adding the sidewalks. When you do this, the correct way would be to

1) Add sidewalk=separate + foot=use_sidepath to the carriage way (or sidewalk=left or sidewalk=right if you map only the sidewalk on side)
2) Either consistently map or not map sidewalks in a neighbourhood of similar streets.

Happy mapping!

Cool, looks like it's tagged correctly then!

Do you happen to know how residents access their sidestreets, like for example Šivičeva?

Ok. Thank you for keeping track of this. Accurate contribution to Openstreetmap is always very welcome.

You should obviously not do wrong mapping in OSM because of your individual software requirements. The way to go would be to improve your software, not hacking osm data by adding wrong tags.

As you might be aware, openstreetmap is a community project. The data are free to *use* by they *belong* to the community. Thousands of voluntary mappers put millions of hours of unpaid work into this project. It serves a very wide range of a multitude of purposes. OSM is not built to serve the special purposes of only particular company.

There are a couple of good routing engines that distinguish between pedestrians and cyclists. One example is Graphhopper:
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?profile=bike&layer=Cyclosm

Hey,
welcome to Openstreetmap. You tagged Ižanska with access=no. A couple of questions:

* The tag implies that *nothing* can can through (not even pedestrians or cyclists). Is this true? If not, then motor_vehicle=no would be the correct tag.

* How long will this restriction last? It is important that someone will remove the tag once construction is over. For short closures, it is often better to not map them at all or to use other mapping techniques that make sure someone will check the progress from time to time

Hi,
Great thing that you're adding all these service roads!

Just a small advice: You tend to create changesets with large spatial extent. This makes is hard for others to understand what you're doing and also to spot mistakes (which happen to everyone).

You make life easier for your fellow mappers if you create smaller changesets.

Thanks. :-)

Great, thanks!

I asked because I have actually seen people adding events, for example "meeting point for city tour on June 1st".

Just out of curiosity: What does parti mean? My translator only says "party".

This looks like an event to me, not like a place: node/8238291073

Is "Trnovski parti" actually the name of this place?

Ah right. :-)

I've removed it as the tag did not add any information that wasn't already there.

Happy mapping!

Hi,
Thanks for adding the playground! However, the name seems to be not a name but description (which the name tag should not be used for). For most playgrounds, there will be no name=* tag, unless they really do have a name.

Thanks for spotting this! I've just corrected it.
changeset/133913800

Cool :-)

Hi,

Can you
a) provide a source for the proposed highway and
b) add the proposed=* tag?

You may know that mapping non-existing things is rather frowned upon by the community. I don't really mind in this particular case, but I'd agree with the wiki insofar as a source should be provided to offer at least a bare minimum of verifiability.

Same for this one: way/1115594603

Also, the way you're adding members to your bus route relations does not conform PTv2 standards, see osm.wiki/Buses

The wiki is a bit confusing there. Where it speaks of "stops", it does *not * mean public_transport=stop_position, highway=platform (which is the area where people wait for the bus, next to the carriageway)

Hej,

this looks more like a ford than a bridge on the aerial imagery way/904899701

Do you know that I bridge has been built here recently or is this a mistake?

Hey,

it seems you're creating gaps in existing bus routes when you're creating new ones. I'm not sure how this happens.

I see you're using JOSM, which in my experience is quite good for dealing with relations. I don't know if you get warnings from JOSM when you're editing routes. But if you do get warnings, then please take them seriously.

A number of bus routes have become broken in Ljubljana in the past few weeks. (which I'm currently fixing)

Anyways, great thing that you're contribution to completing the LPP network!