… using maps from the IGNTG. pffffffffff.

hi. I did not personally see the place, but are you really sure it's 'natural=cliff' that what you mapped? my first guess would be two vertical concrete walls, but I prefer not guessing, so if you say you it's cliffs the best way to express reality …

I guess if I ever visit the place (or if we have some photographic coverage for the area) we could decide whether the wood is part of the "Aldeas Infantiles SOS" or not. my guess is that there's a single uninterrupted fence all around the area, that includes the wood. but without checking, I would not know. I have commented to the original author. changeset/107731229

hola. you here added another checkpoint, it's not just a building. I don't think that you need the layer=-1 for a building passage (it's not underground). maybe you can use this hint? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885697321
(please note: I'm asking for review on my contribution.)

hola. si se encuentra en la zona y no piensa poder editar directamente, también tiene la oportunidad de apoyar el proyecto OSM con información, que otros puedan procesar. los invito a conocer la comunidad OSM, por ejemplo en el foro https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61 o en las listas de correo https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/

hola, thanks for attention to detail. I'm wondering, maybe there's no need for a relation excluding the wood and the pitch. your opinion?

precisely: you can't have read the name from Maxar. while Kaart performed a survey. the name of the road still comes from that survey. maybe replace `source` with `source:name`?

Hola. Gracias Milton por quitar la cláusula SA de vuestra licencia. Sin embargo podrían considerar una excepción explícita? Así como lo mencioné en el foro.

Aha, I see... But what is the added value of removing the reference to the Kaart survey?

hola, disculpa si te comento a un mes de distancia, vi que editabas con "StreetComplete" y no me fijé en el contenido del conjunto de cambios. Le pusiste dirección al edificio de la estación? "addr:housenumber" sería el número cívico (identificativo de una puerta) y tiene sentido en combinación con los otros elementos "namespace" addr (el prefijo). quizás era otra cosa que querías hacer?

changeset:113820114

It's a bit more difficult than that, because you reused existing nodes, moving them, and you created objects that need to be split before we can add them to relations. I'll restore the previous administrative border, saving your fixes. please do contact the community for help when you don't know how to proceed, as in this case.

I see what happened: you corrected the mouthing of the stream, but did not notice that the stream was being used as a border for the two relations. without knowing whether the river should be used as border or the border should run where the river had been incorrectly placed, I would not know which would be the correct fix. the easiest one would be to retrieve the nodes you deleted, forming the segment of the river you removed, and put it back as border but not as river. easiest, if you used JOSM.

… you added a segment to the Quebrada Chiriquicito (why did you need that?) and you did not add it to the two now broken relations.
… the segment 12451026, "outer" for Rambalá, should end at the mouthing of Quebrada Chiriquicito.
… the segment 255435819, "outer" for Chiriquí Grande, should end at that same point.
(is this enough explanation? do you want someone to fix it for you? would you prefer experimenting a bit further? I suggest make use of chat groups if you want assistance while editing.)

it is very possible that the source of your mistake was joining segments. an object that we were using as "outer" for the relation now ends somewhere else.

oops: I added all the trees in the Viento Solar collection, and not only didn't I ever complete the genus/species work, I also forgot to add the 'natural=tree' tag!

ah, la Panamericana! también me ha pasado que al editar intersecciones me han salido cambios hasta Alaska. :-)

oops, qué conjuntos de cambios más gigantesco! que pasó? abarca de Patagonia a Guatemala.

I'm adding two tags to mark it as a sea wreck. I'm removing the descriptive name. if you can have a look at the wiki page and complete the tagging?
changeset:113810456

I'm glad if you can use my comment. "in general", I can't recall noticing your team in my current land of residence. if you do go map Panama, please make use of the forum to alert the tiny local community, of your intentions, and do also inquire about the needs that people feel regarding the OSM database.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61