OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
136146837 22 days ago

I don't really know exactly what this shop sells - it's been a while, and it was probably just added off of my Mapillary captures of this area.

shop=esoteric would probably work fine here, however

169315039 5 months ago

*Bel Air

whoops

154073433 about 1 year ago

If I had to guess, I would imagine it was the probable street number

126485073 almost 2 years ago

shop=esoteric seems reasonable enough - will re-tag this node

133152827 almost 2 years ago

I would imagine it was more or less a recommendation to double-check - I believe they were visible on street-side imagery, though, conceivably they could have been removed after (I would appraise that as unlikely) or were placed slightly off from locations imputed from front-facing street-view.

117098958 almost 4 years ago

is classifying this land as shrubland proper for a (former [though, still 'filled land'] and not currently in use) landfill? (abandoned:landuse=landfill ?)

66288955 almost 4 years ago

at a glance, it does not look particularly threatening - a swimming pool was removed, a house number was added, and minor nodes removed

64883367 over 4 years ago

I would imagine it means what it says - it was the former landuse here - the new location appears to be off of Appleton Road (ccfarmmuseum.org). While I don't remember exactly why I added the area, I would guess it would be to personally keep track of (current or non) 'park' landuse within Cecil County.. so, yes, it probably should be removed.

103123305 over 4 years ago

I have no idea how to navigate turn-restrictions here..

73704478 over 5 years ago

Noted.

66111120 almost 6 years ago

I've changed the tag to 'socket:type1_combo', which is probably accurate in this instance. I have not *confirmed* this, but I'll confirm this in person when able..

74487896 about 6 years ago

Regarding the trail by the water deleted as part of this changeset - It's still part of the current trail map, despite the fact that it was officially closed off due to erosion - I had already marked it as 'access=no' to indicate this. I don't know the current status of the trail or its future.

74782804 about 6 years ago

*US 40

74459852 over 6 years ago

It probably would have been preferable to keep the geometry for the removed roads and re-tag as highway=proposed (or something along those lines). I do not currently know how to revert..

74275448 over 6 years ago

lines*, as I apparently cannot spell

73253099 over 6 years ago

The outgoing mail tag really isn't important - omitting it and just tagging it as a letter box would be fine

73253099 over 6 years ago

This specific one (node/6701735742) is a shared private cluster mailbox for tenants in a section of this shopping center - there are multiple addresses associated with it, though, also a slot for outgoing mail. I was not sure what the best way of tagging it would be, but I would consider it more so a letter box than a post box (high capacity, public).

72244393 over 6 years ago

Deleting the company-specific tags may be the better option - it would keep the address and suite for future tenants, and general node history

51496587 over 6 years ago

Noted. Some additional county parks (primarily rec. fields) are also tagged recreation_ground as well - I'll re-tag them.

62502966 almost 7 years ago

Per the Harford Glen rules, the trails are strictly for walking (and for those capable of it, probably private use for the maintenance crew) . I'll re-tag the paths at some point to more tersely note this, but I'm not done in this area.. and it's open to the public again in April.