letsridebikes's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131310060 | over 2 years ago | Why did you add bicycle=no, horse=no to St. Andrew's Church in Whitminster? I was there last weekend and that isn't the case, the driveway is open to all visitors? |
| 132985085 | over 2 years ago | Hello, why did you set bicycle=no to various rural tracks and footpaths around the Stroudwater Navigation? I've been on a few survey walks and there's no signage to indicate a ban on cycling. Cotswold Canals Trust, the keepers of the Thames & Severn Way, are generally OK with considerate cycling, and it's in regular use on the Strava heat map? Thanks |
| 135982119 | over 2 years ago | Actually, my mistake, I found it wasn't your fault after all. And the Stroud Brewery Bridge (at Wallbridge) double-mini roundabout is well mapped by you without affecting relations. Well done. Just be careful with the 'combine' tool! |
| 135982119 | over 2 years ago | I've just found another roundabout where you broke all the relations by combining them, so I'm going to go ahead and revert this changeset now. Please don't do it again. |
| 135912421 | over 2 years ago | Please try to leave a more detailed changeset comment; it's very unclear what your intent was |
| 135982119 | over 2 years ago | Hi, when you combined ways on the Cainscross Roundabout, you broke the relations that use only a segment of the roundabout (for example bus routes, the Walk Around Stroud Way), and also the sidewalk tagging which changes around the different sides. Please be careful with combining ways in future where ground truth, or relation routes, change. Thank you! |
| 127139978 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I didn't see any signage this was a private road, what are you basing the change on? Thanks! |
| 134042545 | almost 3 years ago | Source is wrong, should be survey not LIDAR |
| 129834374 | about 3 years ago | That should of course say "no evidence for access=destination". For example, it is fine to walk down here en route to Hailey Wood. Whoops! |
| 129063162 | about 3 years ago | Source comment was a mistake - should be Bing; survey |
| 128479442 | about 3 years ago | Lots of background reading here. https://www.cotswoldcanals.net/inglesham-lock |
| 127462923 | about 3 years ago | Thanks for the footway info! Why the access=no tag, though? That's not common for public footpaths |
| 128263192 | about 3 years ago | Source of information: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-63445154 |
| 128005186 | about 3 years ago | Accidentally uploaded with no comment. Added uppermost lock at Siddington Locks from CC-BY NLS (National Library of Scotland) historic imagery. |
| 126475903 | over 3 years ago | Should of course say West! Not east |
| 122764288 | over 3 years ago | Not to worry, I already did! changeset/125825045 Wotton is small enough JOSM could take care of it in one go. Thanks again! |
| 122764288 | over 3 years ago | Hello! Thank you for mapping so many houses around Wotton!
|
| 98159965 | over 3 years ago | Hi, found this while updating the canal! In future you might want to add the landuse=construction tag, see here landuse=construction Thanks for contributing to the Ocean railway bridge rebuild! |
| 123116912 | over 3 years ago | Source for this should have been 'survey' from a walk this morning, not 'Bing; Land Registry Cadastral Parcels'. Apologies for the incorrect info |
| 119702254 | over 3 years ago | Wrong changeset comment, apologies - should be "tagged sections of A38 with no cycle lanes" |