Änderung zurückgesetzt, da Google Maps keine legale Quelle für OSM ist.
changeset/129906764

Please think about the consequences of your edits:
relation/222351#map=15/43.3885/-80.3702
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.38014&lat=43.45991&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please be careful editing multipolygons!
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-115.22824&lat=52.77230&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Was soll das für ein Sport sein: sport=choting? Bisher nie gehört.
way/1115576076#map=18/51.13231/14.38025

Wirklich besser ?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.87062&lat=48.02241&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please fix : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.83861&lat=44.26896&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Cause: node/10172797388

Please consider the unintended side effect of your changes:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-64.44796&lat=44.19075&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Multipolygonee dienen der Erfassung von Flächenobj3kten, sie sind kein Sammlung von berlieben Objekten.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.01879&lat=53.53655&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please pay attention to context and sideffects of your edits:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.50422&lat=44.73328&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ich habe den Namen lediglich von der Vorgänger-Flächenrelation übernommen: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mcY

Die Fläche war als Multipolygon als landuse=farmland (Acker) eingetragen:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%5Bdate%3A%222022-04-06T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%5D%3B(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:relation(5497228)%3B%3E%3B)%3Bout%20meta%20qt%3B&C=47.3812;8.01598;17&R.
Nach meiner Erinnerung wollte ich das dem Luftbild entsprechend zu landuse=meadow (Wiese) ändern.

Auf quarry wäre ich niegekommen, Was wird denn da abgebaut?

When do you plan to fix/finish?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.29293&lat=46.58528&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Something went wrong here:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.65626&lat=45.44129&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Why did you delete the outer member from these multipolygons?
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/11131522
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/11198161
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/216097

Warum eine Relation relation/14546367 als Sammlung von Zaunabschnitten? Wenn zwingend, warum eine
boundary-Relation, welches Objekt soll die Relation abgrenzen? Und was hat die Routen-Relation relation/14546366 darin zu suchen?
Wobei diese Routenrelation gar keine Route ist, sondern nur eine Sammlung von einzelnen Wegabschnitten ist. Was auch für die Relation relation/14546365 zutrifft.
Und bitte beachte osm.wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Two different features at same position:
way/295525073#map=17/49.18454/-121.68698https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090883560#map=17/49.18454/-121.68698

Das ist irgendeine Ralation, aber bestimmt kein multipolygon:
relation/14534423
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.78331&lat=50.85215&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Wenn verbessern, dann bitte konsequent: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.13645&lat=51.13595&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Bitte sauberer zeichnen, sonst können die Flächen nicht gerendert werden
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.52116&lat=48.18347&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways

Gehören die inner-Flächen tatsächlich nicht zum Campingplatz?
relation/14448193#map=17/54.33665/9.96082