OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
128843854 7 months ago

Tatsächlic Kieselsteine osm.wiki/File:Pebbleswithquarzite.jpg?

166539232 7 months ago

Changeset reverted with changeset/166574426 - restored 3 deleted member ways of boundary relations.

165577480 8 months ago

oneway ergibt keinen Sinn bei Flächen
relation/9921601

165042073 8 months ago

War es Absicht, dass Du folgende Wege gelöscht und damit das railway-Multipolygon relation/6838462 verstümmelt hast hast?
way/463049060
way/45263051
way/448809564
way/463049055
way/463049048
way/463049061

164912580 9 months ago

Da ist wohl einiges schiefgegangen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.90282&lat=52.59044&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Sieht mir ganz nache ienem missglückten Import aus. Jede Menge verwaister Knoten/überschneidende Linien.
Bitte unbedingt JOSM-Validator beachten.

164340427 9 months ago

changeset/164375199

Please map more carefully.

164188128 9 months ago

Which properties qualify way/212569318 as a motorway (highway=motorway)?

163659257 9 months ago

relation/18840915
This is not a multipolygon. Multipolygons are relations of polygons (closed rings) with at least one member in the role outer. They are intended for surfaces.

163535709 10 months ago

Please work more carefully:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.73747&lat=45.35639&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
And please do not overlap areas with identical key natural or landuse.

163506237 10 months ago

Das sind keine Multipolygone:

relation/18810840
relation/18808048
relation/18806833

Multipolygone sind für Flächen. Sie haben nur Polygone (geschlossene Ringe) als Mitglieder!

163324578 10 months ago

Your updates have probably failed:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.76396&lat=44.62007&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

162567966 10 months ago

Bitte Wege nicht mehrfach mit widersprüchlichen Eigenschaften erfassen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.75209&lat=49.36923&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicated_edges
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.75240&lat=49.39493&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicated_edges
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.77846&lat=49.37604&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicated_edges

162793972 10 months ago

Please fix:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.69261&lat=45.40418&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

By the way: JOSM provides a validation tool which detects such issues before data upload

162648417 10 months ago

Wenn Du Teile von Multipolygonen löschst, kümmere dich bitte auch um den übrig gebliebenen Rest:
Stand vor deiner Bearbeitung: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ZaN
Stand nach deiner Bearbeitung: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ZaK

161968622 10 months ago

Multipolygone kennen nur member mit den Rollen "outer" oder "inner"

162172254 11 months ago

Es ist nicht vordringliche Aufgabe von OSM, ein bestimmtes Kartenbild zu erzeugen, sondern möglichst realitätsgetreue topographische Daten zu erfassen. Und ein Acker oder Wiese endet nunmal spätestens am Straßenrand.

161894427 11 months ago

Was hat denn das way/49043465 mit der Stadtmoosach zu tun. Und warum tagged man das als etwas, das es nicht ist? Etwa nur weil einem die Signatur in der gerenderten Karte gefällt?

161523662 11 months ago

… und dabei das Multipolygon zerstört https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/16229671

160799439 12 months ago

Und was ist mit dem Rest relation/6797225#map=13/48.83071/15.61738 ?

160812349 12 months ago

Bitte sorgfältiger bei der Bearbeitung der Grenzrelationen vorgehen: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.16100&lat=47.15816&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways