Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for looking into my edit. Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway. I have now modified the segment to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106789109) with modifications.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for looking into my edits. I have added highway=service as the segment was connecting several entities. I have changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106789005) with modifications.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi SafetyIng,
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106788853) with modifications.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have now changed the highway classification of the service road to driveway. Please find the changeset for suggested modification (#106788552).
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi SafetyIng,
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (#106727631) with modifications. Good day!
Regards
Karmsudi

Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for looking into my edits. I have added highway=service as the driveway was connecting couple of entities. I was reluctant to add service=driveway as the nature of the buildings was unknown. Please suggest me if this can be added service=driveway in this scenario. Regards,
karmsudi

Hi PT-53,
Thanks for looking into our edits. I have added the roads (way ids: 955360245,955360246) based on Bing and Esri clarity imagery, as the path seemed clear to draw. Apologies for misalignment & wrong addition. Thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to maintain editing hygiene in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community. Regards,
karmsudi

Hello PT-53,
Thanks for looking into my edit. Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway. I have now modified the segment to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106596028) with modifications.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi PT-53,
I have added a service road as the segment leads to more than a single entity. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (106595932) with suggested modifications.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi aachso,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have accidentally moved the feature. Thanks for the heads up, please find the changeset (#102161788) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community
Thanks,
karmsudi

Hi pbnoxious,

I have added the track road from an existing track road. But yes, as per aerial imagery it is clearly paved. I have extended the road as per your suggestion and modified the highway tag of the other track to service(Changeset:98692628). Thanks for your constructive feedback. Happy to learn from you.

Regards
karmsudi

Hi PT-53,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have misinterpreted the highway tag based on the vicinity and added the service road. Thanks for the suggestions. Please find the changeset #97302284 for the modifications. I have added the gate based on the available imagery. Please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality and needs to be modified. Always happy to learn from the community

Regards,
karmsudi

Hi PT-53,
Thanks for your time for looking into our edits. I have added the service road as I am not aware of the type of the entity. Thanks for your constructive feedback. I have made the corrections as per your suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi tordans,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the highway tag based on the available imagery. It is good to see the community improvising our edit quality. It can be helpful if you can guide me to determine the highway tag more precisely based on the OSM resources. Always happy to learn from the community
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi DaveF,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed adding the source. I have used latest " private maxar imagery" to make this edit. Going forward, I will make sure to mention the source column for all such edits. Thanks for the heads up. Always happy to learn from the community
Regards.
karmsudi

Hi Hauke,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Going forward, I will stick to the driveways in this scenarios. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn form the community
Thanks
Karmsudi

Hi abrensch,

Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. I had miscalculated barrier as gate and added the private access. Now, I have modified the geometry and edited the access tags as suggested using the private Maxar imagery. Please find the changeset(81777626) for suggested modifications. Once again, thanks for the quick review. Please let me know in case of anymore modifications. Always happy to improve the editing hygiene from the community suggestions.

Regards
karmsudi

Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for looking into my edit. It is a honest mistake from my part. I am relatively new to OSM and hence this mistake happened. I have discussed this with my supervisors who have educated me to add meaningful data towards OSM. Removing the barrier (Changeset no #77126641) which should not have been there at first place. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions. Will be happy to learn from the community.

Best Regards
Karmasudi

Hi ndm,
Thanks for looking into my edit.It was an honest mistake.Would take this as learning for the further edits.Please let me know if anything needs to be changed.Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
karmsudi

Hi Phil,

Thanks for the clarification. I am also aligned with your view. I have made the edit as per your suggestions (#74298269). Let me know in case you have any more suggestion.

Regards
Karmsudi