jpennycook's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123196426 | over 3 years ago | Hi! In this changeset, you've tagged Mottisfont Lane, a public highway, with motor_vehicle=designated, foot=yes, bicycle=no (or bicycle=designated on some parts), and horse=no. This road is a designated cycle route - part of the National Cycle Network Route 24. I did not see any restrictions on horse riding. Could you confirm these restrictions on horses and cyclists, please? e.g. way/549217960
See also Mapillary, which does not show any signs with such restrictions:-
On a normal public highway without restrictions, there is no need for motor_vehicle=designated - I would normally expect to see that tag on a byway open to all traffic, or on a motorway. Jon |
| 122089332 | over 3 years ago | correction - surveys 19/03/2022 and 15/05/2022 |
| 121289957 | over 3 years ago | This was a reversion of changeset/120848952 |
| 121046079 | over 3 years ago | Thanks. Looking at it, there isn't a bridge as such, so I've changed the stream section under the road to tunnel=culvert. I've added the traffic calming nodes from my Mapillary footage. Jon |
| 121046079 | over 3 years ago | Hi!
For example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=476955880222998 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=381190796540769 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1118271181983940 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=170478681745310 I also see that you've tagged the whole road as bridge=yes - I assume this only applied to the section over the stream. Jon |
| 120849644 | over 3 years ago | If you look at the history of the roads around Nine Mile Ride Extension and Park Lane, you will see that I edited them quite recently based on a survey at the beginning of May - hence how I know that one of the roads you added does not exist. |
| 120849644 | over 3 years ago | Hello. With OpenStreetMap, you have to be careful to use up-to-date information that isn't subject to copyright ( osm.org/copyright - particularly the "Copyright infringement" section and osm.wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs ). If OpenStreetMap contains data from disallowed sources, it could be subject to legal action. OpenStreetMap is used for all kinds of uses, including journey planning for logistics companies, hence it is important that the information is correct.
Examples of acceptable sources (see also source=* ):-
Examples of disallowed sources:-
If you have used any of the disallowed sources in your previous changesets, you should add a note to each giving your source so they can be remapped using allowed sources. Jon |
| 120848952 | over 3 years ago | Hi! In this changeset, you've changed Lower Earley Way, Lower Earley Way North, and Whitley Wood Lane from highway=secondary to highway=primary, but left the ref as B3270. What was the source for this edit? Have the roads been upgraded to "A" roads?
Jon |
| 120871943 | over 3 years ago | Mapillary footage example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=427489689046900 |
| 120872073 | over 3 years ago | Mapillary footage example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=406901017735941 |
| 120849644 | over 3 years ago | This road does not exist: way/1026367799 |
| 120849644 | over 3 years ago | Hello. Again, can I ask what the source of your edit is? Park Lane is now divided by bollards north of Nine Mile Ride Extension. Jon |
| 119527796 | over 3 years ago | Hello. When you're next in Spencers Wood, could you have a look at node/9296730065/history and changeset/120831749 please? I'm surprised that the the kerbs and bollards have been removed and the Croft Road reverted to oneway. Jon |
| 120831749 | over 3 years ago | Hi!
Jon |
| 120803032 | over 3 years ago | Hi! You added two items that seem odd:-
Jon |
| 120666557 | over 3 years ago | Hi! This changeset deleted the link between the segregated cycleway and Addlestone Moor, meaning that journey planners would be unable to access the cycleway. I've rejoined them now. Jon |
| 119895884 | over 3 years ago | For example, results from two different journey planners which still have the bridge paths as bicycle=dismount:-
Both are interpreting bicycle=dismount correctly. Jon |
| 119895884 | over 3 years ago | for example, iD has this:-
Jon |
| 119895884 | over 3 years ago | Hi! That's not the case - bicycle=yes means bikes can be ridden. If there are Cyclists Dismount signs, then the tagging must be bicycle=dismount. Jon |
| 119895884 | over 3 years ago | Hi! When I was last in the area, the narrow footways around Loddon Bridge had signs saying "Cyclists Dismount". Have the signs been removed now? The signs are visible on Mapillary:-
Jon |