Hi!

Thanks for looking at the shared use path along the new section of the Winnersh Relief Road. You've marked it as construction=yes - highway=construction/construction=cycleway might be better (as per construction=*) - this should make it show up as "under construction" on the map. I'll change it shortly.
Did you see if there was a crossing between way/931020495 and way/905525074 ?

Jon

Thanks! Sorry - I didn't see your reply until now.

Hi!

What was your source for removing access=private from way/765834177/history ? It's a private farm access road with a gate.

Jon

Hi!

You've removed access=private from this road: way/263146083/history
Can I ask what your source is for this change? This road is the private access road to the fishery, and is not open to the public as a through route.

Jon

Hi!

You've removed "access=private" from way/291527653/history
As far as I can see, it's neither a public highway nor a public right of way - are you sure that it's open to the public to use as a through route? It looked like a private farm access road when I passed it last month.
Also, when you are adding new tracks and service roads, it would help if you could specify the access restrictions and surface details if known.

Jon

Hi!

Are you sure this is a footpath: way/904493440/history - I've not seen it from either the M3 nor the A33. It's also highly unlikely that a footpath would join a motorway.

Jon

Also, I see that the railway bridge way/922866784/ is joined to the foot tunnel way/922866786 - they share a nodes node/8567022653 / node/8567022658

Jon

Hi!

If you have a way tagged as a tunnel or bridge, the way above or below it does not need to be tagged as a bridge or tunnel (e.g. way/922866784/history). See bridge=* ("But both options should not be used at the same time (a bridge tag for the upper way and a tunnel for the lower way for the same crossing).")

Jon

Thanks!

Hi!

The roundabout on Forbury Road had separate ways because of the associated bus routes, which you can see here (until it updates to reflect this changeset): changeset/101829810#map=19/51.45692/-0.96347&layers=T.

Jon

Sorry - these links should work:- way/863137601, way/145509342

Hi.

You've changed way/888267403 from a road to a footway. Should it be a cycleway in common with way/863137601&layers=YN and way/145509342#map=18/51.39751/-0.95855&layers=YN ? Other roads in the area that have been blocked to motor vehicles have retained access for cyclists.

Jon

Note that I'm not too happy with mapping the bus lane as a separate service road in this case when the tagging from way/37196331 seems perfectly adequate for the whole of South Street between Town Lane and St James's Street

Hi!
Private tracks and roads are supposed to be on the map. Just because the general public don't have access, they are still useful. The best thing to do is tag them as access=private.

See access=private and access=*

Jon

Hi!
Private tracks and roads are supposed to be on the map. Just because the general public don't have access, they are still useful. The best thing to do is tag them as access=private.

See access=private and access=*

Jon

Hi!
Private tracks and roads are supposed to be on the map. Just because the general public don't have access, they are still useful. The best thing to do is tag them as access=private.

See access=private and access=*

Jon

Thanks for fixing the bus routes on the roundabout in Lychpit after I broke them!

Hello.
Thanks for fixing the bicycle access on that section of bridleway - I have no idea why I set it to "no" in the first place.

Jon

Hi.
The restriction will be for motor vehicles - by putting access=destination on the way, this will also restrict pedestrians, which isn't the intention. I'll change access= to motor_vehicle= on these ways.

Jon

Thanks!