Hi.
In this changeset, you changed a lot of cycleways to highway=footway. Can I ask why? As you can see at Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/sMgvaPymjZeMYfbsM72wSQ) these are marked with the cycleway sign as shown here: osm.wiki/Cycling_in_the_United_Kingdom

Jon

Hi!

Unfortunately, this edit put a strange kink in Black Dam Way cycle path (way/207216000 and way/207216007). I'll fix that tomorrow.
I also see that you have joined highways to landuses - e.g. where a footway or road is close to agricultural land or to a wood. This isn't necessary.

Jon

Sorry - thanks for fixing Pembroke Broadway.

Jon

Thanks for fixing Pembroke Road.

Jon

Hello.

You've marked way/742828363 with "motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2018 Dec 03-2021 Jun 11 Mo-Su,PH 00:00-24:00)". I have used that road recently. Although a lane was closed, the road was not closed to motor vehicles - see "https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/k2DasZjl2KVdzpRpsZ_j_g" and "https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/mFrZA5F01jvXyrz6J3LIAA" for example

Could you correct your edit, please?

Jon

You're right - I'll fix it shortly

Hi.
It doesn't matter if horses actually use the paths - Public Bridleways are still rights of way for horses and bicycles. Can I suggest highway=path (if it's narrow) or highway=track (if it's wide) - both of these are acceptable for Public Bridleways according to osm.wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines

Thanks for fixing the disconnected paths.

Jon

In case you're not sure where the Public Bridleways are, you can see them here: https://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=Lightwater&map=OSM&lat=51.3524&lon=0.667134&lonew=W

Hello again.

way/361793009/history is another Public Bridleway that you have changed to highway=footway. Can you check that this is tagged correctly?

Jon

Hi.

You've changed way/361976524/history from "highway=bridleway" to "highway=footway", but left it as "designation=public_bridleway". Are you sure that it's a footway rather than a bridleway? According to osm.wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines, a public bridleway should be tagged as highway=bridleway or highway=path, unless it follows a road or track.
Secondly, you seem to have disconnected a number of footpaths near Albert Road (south of here: way/693954329) - was this intentional?

Jon

Hi!
Thanks for adding the new Frith Hill cycleway from Deepcut.
In this changeset, you changed the Public Bridleway at way/543387565 from highway=track to highway=footway. We discussed this before in changeset/54335610. osm.wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Bridleways says "If the bridleway follows either a track, unclassified road or service road, then tag it as such", otherwise it should be tagged as highway=bridleway or highway=path. https://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=Deepcut&map=OSM&lat=51.3105&lon=0.702436&lonew=W shows where the Public Bridleways are located. I will fix it shortly.

Jon

Hi.

It looks like you didn't actually remove the existing section of road when you added the bridge, so there is duplication. In addition, could you add the missing details from way/639179159 to way/733942061 (carriageway, lanes, lit, maxspeed, name, oneway, surface) as you've missed them off the bridge section.

Jon

Hi!

Could you add access restrictions to the road that you added (way/733100554), please? According to osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom , people using journey planners could be routed through the school when travelling between Redlake Lane and Heathlands Road, which may not be correct. Perhaps access=private (see access=*) might be better.

Jon

Hi.

You merged some of the crossings of Chobham Road near Victoria Way into one (way/581355478). This had the effect of adding all the relations from the individual ways into the single merged way, which isn't correct. Could you split them again, please?

Jon

Hi.
Your changeset comment suggests that you are going to create a new unofficial route for the Basingstoke Canal Towpath. The Basingstoke Canal Towpath officially only exists on one side for much of the route - there are paths on the other side for some of the route, but they are not officially part of the canal towpath (i.e. they are not marked with the official canal quarter mile markers). Please only include towpaths that are officially part of the Basingstoke Canal in the relations.

Jon

Good luck!

Jon

Hello.
I assume you're referring to relation/1144864 - the tags were removed (not by me) in this changeset: changeset/67716407 ("Removal of Route 8 bus line")

Jon

Hello.

When you replaced way/37121091/history with way/730808491 the details of the access and the surface were lost. Could you put them back in please?

Jon

Hi.

You've added a fence that joins with (i.e. shares a node with) a cycleway, implying that the cycleway is blocked. Is this correct, or should the fence stop before the cycleway?
Fence: way/729329293#map=18/51.14612/-0.98494&layers=C
Cycleway: way/166311151#map=21/51.14550/-0.98249&layers=C

Jon

Hi.

There's no need to specify access/bicycle/motor_vehicle if the values match the defaults shown here: osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom
In addition, access=yes can be ambiguous and does not really mean much.

Jon