OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
123196426 over 3 years ago

Hi!

In this changeset, you've tagged Mottisfont Lane, a public highway, with motor_vehicle=designated, foot=yes, bicycle=no (or bicycle=designated on some parts), and horse=no. This road is a designated cycle route - part of the National Cycle Network Route 24. I did not see any restrictions on horse riding. Could you confirm these restrictions on horses and cyclists, please?

e.g. way/549217960
way/134464901

See also Mapillary, which does not show any signs with such restrictions:-
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=779116209680534
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=721733902296614

On a normal public highway without restrictions, there is no need for motor_vehicle=designated - I would normally expect to see that tag on a byway open to all traffic, or on a motorway.

Jon

122089332 over 3 years ago

correction - surveys 19/03/2022 and 15/05/2022

121289957 over 3 years ago

This was a reversion of changeset/120848952

121046079 over 3 years ago

Thanks. Looking at it, there isn't a bridge as such, so I've changed the stream section under the road to tunnel=culvert. I've added the traffic calming nodes from my Mapillary footage.

Jon

121046079 over 3 years ago

Hi!
I see you removed traffic_calming=bump from Ludgrove. Can you confirm that it has gone, please - the traffic calming was very annoying when I was last there.

For example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=476955880222998 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=381190796540769 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1118271181983940 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=170478681745310

I also see that you've tagged the whole road as bridge=yes - I assume this only applied to the section over the stream.

Jon

120849644 over 3 years ago

If you look at the history of the roads around Nine Mile Ride Extension and Park Lane, you will see that I edited them quite recently based on a survey at the beginning of May - hence how I know that one of the roads you added does not exist.

120849644 over 3 years ago

Hello.

With OpenStreetMap, you have to be careful to use up-to-date information that isn't subject to copyright ( osm.org/copyright - particularly the "Copyright infringement" section and osm.wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs ). If OpenStreetMap contains data from disallowed sources, it could be subject to legal action.

OpenStreetMap is used for all kinds of uses, including journey planning for logistics companies, hence it is important that the information is correct.
When entering data into OSM, you need to enter a proper changeset comment, giving details of your source and what you are trying to achieve. In addition, use the boxes in the "source" section to select or enter sources.

Examples of acceptable sources (see also source=* ):-
• Bing aerial imagery or any imagery visible in iD
• OSMUK Cadastral parcels ( https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/ )
• things you have seen yourself or recorded in a GPS trace, including road signs
• things you have seen when using Mapillary or KartaView - both allow and encourage use of their imagery for OSM

Examples of disallowed sources:-
• Google Maps, StreetView, or Earth
• Council websites
• Developer websites
• documents, maps, or plans issued by councils
• documents, maps, or plans issued by developers
• Ordnance Survey maps ( osm.wiki/Ordnance_Survey - "OSM takes great care not to taint the database with intellectual property rights belonging to outside parties.")

If you have used any of the disallowed sources in your previous changesets, you should add a note to each giving your source so they can be remapped using allowed sources.

Jon

120848952 over 3 years ago

Hi!

In this changeset, you've changed Lower Earley Way, Lower Earley Way North, and Whitley Wood Lane from highway=secondary to highway=primary, but left the ref as B3270. What was the source for this edit? Have the roads been upgraded to "A" roads?
B roads should be tagged as highway=secondary - see osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom

Jon

120871943 over 3 years ago

Mapillary footage example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=427489689046900

120872073 over 3 years ago

Mapillary footage example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=406901017735941

120849644 over 3 years ago

This road does not exist: way/1026367799

120849644 over 3 years ago

Hello.

Again, can I ask what the source of your edit is? Park Lane is now divided by bollards north of Nine Mile Ride Extension.

Jon

119527796 over 3 years ago

Hello.

When you're next in Spencers Wood, could you have a look at node/9296730065/history and changeset/120831749 please? I'm surprised that the the kerbs and bollards have been removed and the Croft Road reverted to oneway.

Jon

120831749 over 3 years ago

Hi!
These changes to Croft Road don't make much sense.
Were your edits based on a recent survey? If you look at the Mapillary footage, you'll see a barrier on one leg of Croft Road that blocks all traffic. Has this barrier now been removed?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=402978604640921

Jon

120803032 over 3 years ago

Hi!

You added two items that seem odd:-
* way/1058990732 - I've not seen any signs saying this part of town is called "ends". If this is the correct name, should it be capitalised?
* way/1058990733 - is this house really called "the crib"? You might want to look at osm.wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#Address_tags

Jon

120666557 over 3 years ago

Hi!

This changeset deleted the link between the segregated cycleway and Addlestone Moor, meaning that journey planners would be unable to access the cycleway. I've rejoined them now.

Jon

119895884 over 3 years ago

For example, results from two different journey planners which still have the bridge paths as bicycle=dismount:-
https://cycle.travel/map?from=Loddon%20Bridge%20Road&to=Showcase%20Cinemas&fromLL=51.4384243,-0.9000979&toLL=51.4377265,-0.8979818579245304
https://m.cyclestreets.net/journey/80886741/#17/51.437245/-0.899725

Both are interpreting bicycle=dismount correctly.

Jon

119895884 over 3 years ago

for example, iD has this:-
"indicates that riding bicycle is not allowed, but pushing bicycle is allowed. bicycle=no on objects allowing foot traffic is commonly used to express this.
indicates that riding bicycle is not allowed, but pushing bicycle is allowed. bicycle=no on objects allowing foot traffic is commonly used to express this"
This is tagged as being part of two LCNs (R20, Wokingham Cycleway) and an NCN (NCN422), so bicycle routers should have no problem with it.

Jon

119895884 over 3 years ago

Hi!

That's not the case - bicycle=yes means bikes can be ridden. If there are Cyclists Dismount signs, then the tagging must be bicycle=dismount.

Jon

119895884 over 3 years ago

Hi!

When I was last in the area, the narrow footways around Loddon Bridge had signs saying "Cyclists Dismount". Have the signs been removed now?

The signs are visible on Mapillary:-
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1333204827182144
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1298961507254927

Jon