jpennycook's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 74801477 | about 6 years ago | Thanks for fixing the access tag. Jon |
| 74801477 | about 6 years ago | Having looked more deeply, Whitmead Lane is part of both of signposted cycle route (relation/8521497) and a walking route (relation/5537392). Can you confirm the source and nature of the restriction, please? Jon |
| 74801477 | about 6 years ago | Hello. You have marked Whitmead Lane as "access=destination". I have cycled down here, and there were no restrictions. The road also links two public rights of way (a public footpath and a public bridleway) and is maintained at public expense. Is this restriction only for motor vehicles (as opposed to pedestrians, horses, and cyclists)? If so, could you change it to "motor_vehicle=destination"? Jon |
| 74211358 | over 6 years ago | Hello. You've added a node named "Parking" (node/6779650372#map=21/51.04962/-1.31120&layers=C) in the middle of an existing car park (way/9417973#map=20/51.04967/-1.31127&layers=C). It looks like this addition is redundant.
Jon |
| 74080538 | over 6 years ago | Hello.
Could you fix this please? Jon |
| 73354986 | over 6 years ago | Hello.
Jon |
| 73024282 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for fixing it (and adding the footways in the first place). Jon |
| 73024282 | over 6 years ago | Hello. I see that you've marked the footways that you added around Downmill Road with "bicycle=yes". Is this new? I don't recall seeing the round blue signs allowing cycling (except on the west/north side of the road). If so, could you add segregated=yes/no (segregated=*), please? Jon |
| 72936123 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for deleting these two road segments. Jon |
| 72882607 | over 6 years ago | Hello.
Jon |
| 35202258 | over 6 years ago | Hello Andy. It's not the actual name. I'm not sure how that got there. I'll sort it out shortly. Jon |
| 71792055 | over 6 years ago | Thanks! |
| 71792055 | over 6 years ago | Hello. Could you add maxspeed, lit, and surface tags for the two link roads that you created, please? The adjacent roads all have these tags. Jon |
| 71587286 | over 6 years ago | way/159524164 is a private road, so "motor_vehicle=yes" is incorrect. According to access=*#Access_tag_values "motor_vehicle=yes" means that any driver has a legal right of way on this track, which is not true. Please change it to "motor_vehicle=delivery" |
| 69141505 | over 6 years ago | Apologies - I see that you updated it and it was already marked as a cycleway. I will fix it later. Jon |
| 69141505 | over 6 years ago | Hello. You marked Three Post Lane in Lambourn way/136788722 as a cycleway. It is signposted as a public footpath with No Cycling signs either side. Jon |
| 71078121 | over 6 years ago | Hello. I think you forgot to add highway=footway (or highway=path) to these footways. Could you also add the surface, please? Jon |
| 70936295 | over 6 years ago | Thanks - that's great. |
| 70931218 | over 6 years ago | Thanks! Jon |
| 70936295 | over 6 years ago | Hello again. I don't remember there being a ford on Theale Road in the middle of houses (node/6521978494#map=16/51.4140/-1.0571&layers=C). Can you confirm that there is a ford there - i.e. a place where the water runs above the road surface and people would have to cycle or drive through the water rather than the water being below? (ford=yes) Jon |