OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
74801477 about 6 years ago

Thanks for fixing the access tag.

Jon

74801477 about 6 years ago

Having looked more deeply, Whitmead Lane is part of both of signposted cycle route (relation/8521497) and a walking route (relation/5537392). Can you confirm the source and nature of the restriction, please?

Jon

74801477 about 6 years ago

Hello.

You have marked Whitmead Lane as "access=destination". I have cycled down here, and there were no restrictions. The road also links two public rights of way (a public footpath and a public bridleway) and is maintained at public expense. Is this restriction only for motor vehicles (as opposed to pedestrians, horses, and cyclists)? If so, could you change it to "motor_vehicle=destination"?

Jon

74211358 over 6 years ago

Hello.

You've added a node named "Parking" (node/6779650372#map=21/51.04962/-1.31120&layers=C) in the middle of an existing car park (way/9417973#map=20/51.04967/-1.31127&layers=C). It looks like this addition is redundant.
In addition, the "name" part is used for things with names (in the case, it would be "Garnier Road car park") not to describe the thing being added.

Jon

74080538 over 6 years ago

Hello.
It looks like this changeset has broken the cycleway (also a public bridleway) which is part of NCN23 near St Catherine's Hill: way/48127425#map=17/51.03900/-1.31779&layers=C

Could you fix this please?

Jon

73354986 over 6 years ago

Hello.
Can you confirm if the roads that you added were based on GPS traces, or if they are from aerial imagery? The new roundabout was only completed recently, and the car park to the north was removed.

Jon

73024282 over 6 years ago

Thanks for fixing it (and adding the footways in the first place).

Jon

73024282 over 6 years ago

Hello.

I see that you've marked the footways that you added around Downmill Road with "bicycle=yes". Is this new? I don't recall seeing the round blue signs allowing cycling (except on the west/north side of the road). If so, could you add segregated=yes/no (segregated=*), please?

Jon

72936123 over 6 years ago

Thanks for deleting these two road segments.

Jon

72882607 over 6 years ago

Hello.
You've added service roads across a country park - they have not existed for years. Please remove them.

Jon

35202258 over 6 years ago

Hello Andy.

It's not the actual name. I'm not sure how that got there. I'll sort it out shortly.

Jon

71792055 over 6 years ago

Thanks!

71792055 over 6 years ago

Hello.

Could you add maxspeed, lit, and surface tags for the two link roads that you created, please? The adjacent roads all have these tags.

Jon

71587286 over 6 years ago

way/159524164 is a private road, so "motor_vehicle=yes" is incorrect. According to access=*#Access_tag_values "motor_vehicle=yes" means that any driver has a legal right of way on this track, which is not true. Please change it to "motor_vehicle=delivery"

69141505 over 6 years ago

Apologies - I see that you updated it and it was already marked as a cycleway. I will fix it later.

Jon

69141505 over 6 years ago

Hello.

You marked Three Post Lane in Lambourn way/136788722 as a cycleway. It is signposted as a public footpath with No Cycling signs either side.

Jon

71078121 over 6 years ago

Hello.

I think you forgot to add highway=footway (or highway=path) to these footways. Could you also add the surface, please?

Jon

70936295 over 6 years ago

Thanks - that's great.

70931218 over 6 years ago

Thanks!

Jon

70936295 over 6 years ago

Hello again.

I don't remember there being a ford on Theale Road in the middle of houses (node/6521978494#map=16/51.4140/-1.0571&layers=C). Can you confirm that there is a ford there - i.e. a place where the water runs above the road surface and people would have to cycle or drive through the water rather than the water being below? (ford=yes)

Jon