OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
52950046 about 8 years ago

Hello Rigi03.

In addition, you changed the track that runs parallel to The Maultway and Red Road from highway=track to highway=footway. I've used this track, and it's definitely a track. Could you change it back to highway=track please?
way/463748050/history
way/361615768
way/463748048
way/463748051
way/361615769
way/463748049
way/361615762/history
way/7286162

Jon

52950343 about 8 years ago

Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed the cycle path leading from Kingfield Road to Woking Park, signposted as part of the Mars Cycle Trail, from highway=cycleway to highway=footway, and another one linking the Mars Cycle Trail with the Phobos Cycle Trail. Can I ask why? At least the Mars Cycle Trail section is a wide cycle path.

way/338681867
way/338681876
way/498925517/history
way/498925511/history

If it was an error, could you fix it please?

Jon

52949497 about 8 years ago

Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed way/463743116/history from highway=bridleway to highway=footway. The way is tagged as a Public Bridleway. Was there a reason for restricting this to pedestrians, or was this change a mistake?

Jon

52950046 about 8 years ago

Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed way/442110934 and other ways between Red Road and Brentmoor Road from highway=track to highway=footway. Was this by mistake?
This is a public bridleway - if it was narrow, then it should be tagged as highway=bridleway, otherwise horses won't be able to use it. However, I've cycled on this way between Red Road and Brentmoor Road, and it was wide enough to drive a carriage or four wheel motor vehicle down, so I think this should be reverted to highway=track.
For reference:-
highway=track
highway=bridleway
highway=footway - "The tag highway=footway is used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians."

Jon

52687197 about 8 years ago

Hello NickEd90.

In this edit, you joined footway 32404316 with a building (way/170104948). The footway is not part of the building (the walls would present a barrier to walking) but separate. Could you unjoin them please?

Jon

52492438 about 8 years ago

Thanks for the message. Fixed in Changeset #52522284

Jon

52285688 about 8 years ago

Hello.

Thanks for the message. I've fixed these in Changeset #52322726

Jon

48953678 over 8 years ago

Hello GinaroZ

Thanks for the message, and thanks for fixing it too!

Jon

50757138 over 8 years ago

Hello.

In this changeset, you changed at least pelican crossing from highway=crossing; crossing=traffic_signals; crossing_ref=pelican to highway=crossing; crossing=pelican; crossing_ref=pelican
According to crossing=* the crossing should be traffic_signals, and the type (in this case pelican) should be under crossing_ref. I'll correct them as I notice them.

Jon

51722078 over 8 years ago

Thanks - I was worried my notes were wrong. I was a bit rushed when I was looking at Hogwood Lane on Sunday - trying to avoid the rain and wind.

Jon

51722078 over 8 years ago

Hello TurboTippy.

In this changeset you changed the node for the bollard at the eastern end of Hogwood Lane to a kissing gate. I forgot to update this node when I changed the surface detail, but my notes say the bollards were replaced by a metal cycle barrier. Was the metal cycle barrier subsequently changed this week to a kissing gate? If so, does the moving part of the gate allow bicycles to pass through? I note that the wooden kissing gates installed on the greenway to the FBC Centre are a bit narrow for my bike, but I was able to get my bike through the cycle barrier on Hogwood Lane on Sunday.

Jon

51315276 over 8 years ago

Hello Frank.

Thanks for the reply. Perhaps bicycle=permissive might be appropriate.

Jon

51315276 over 8 years ago

Hello franck60

You added a walkway with the following tags, near Walton-on-Thames:-
bicycle yes
crossing zebra
footway crossing
highway footway
surface gravel
Can you confirm that you saw a sign allowing bicycles?
Secondly, how does one access the footway - it is only linked to a private track.
When I was last in the area, I didn't see any signs allowing bicycles on the track.
Finally, you've marked the footway as a zebra crossing. This would seem to be a mistake - could you confirm, please?

Jon

51321858 over 8 years ago

Hello Wiggly.

This edit does not make sense:-
amenity place_of_worship
cuisine burger
name The Blue bucket
Can you correct it, please?

Jon

51316383 over 8 years ago

Hello Wiggly.

I see you have created some places of worship with names like "GNB sniper position 3". Are these really places of worship (as the names suggest otherwise)? If so, could you complete the "religion" and "denomination" tags, please?

Jon

51315908 over 8 years ago

Hello Wiggly.

I see you have created some places of worship with names like "GNB sniper position 1". Are these really places of worship (as the names suggest otherwise)? If so, could you complete the "religion" and "denomination" tags, please?

Jon

50732497 over 8 years ago

Hello.

Thanks for getting rid of the duplicate roads. I noticed some duplicate paths, and deleted them in changeset/50730998

Jon

50701737 over 8 years ago

Hello C1c51.

Thanks for adding all of these paths. I've noticed that you've created some duplicates - e.g. way/511559792 duplicates way/80341747 although the latter (which is the original) has more data. Were you trying to achieve something here, or is it an error.

Jon

50534603 over 8 years ago

Hello Flumpdaddy.

I see you created a number of gates in this changeset at the junctions of roads with footpaths and of bridleway with footpaths. This implies that the road is blocked by the gate. I'll move them off the roads and onto the footpaths.

Jon

49986907 over 8 years ago

changes in changesets 49987141 and 49986907 reversed in changeset/50116356 as the original changes appeared to be test changes - e.g. changing houses to ponds