hi!

The aerial imagery for way/475685460 shows "BUSES ONLY" written in paint on the road. Can you confirm that this has now been removed and that all motor vehicles, not just buses, are allowed to use it?

Jon

Hi!

In the aerial imagery, way/464808090 has "BUS LANE" in paint, and there is a no entry sign with "Except buses and emergency vehicles". Can you confirm that this sign has now been removed and all motor vehicles can now use this section of road?

Jon

It's a long way since I used that road, but service is probably better than track

Probably not incorrect, but whatever it is it's private access

The last time I used Pudding Lane, there were bollards to prevent through motor traffic, and I assume there was a TRO to cover this. If this is no longer the case, go ahead. Don't downgrade non-motor access from designated to yes though.

Hello Colin.

It looks like this admin boundary way has at least one dragged node:-
way/379804190 - are you able to verify it? It's part of these relations:-
Relation Bere Regis (5654591) (as outer)
Relation Affpuddle and Turnerspuddle (5656638) (as outer)

Jon

access=designated

Hi!

I think you've misunderstood what "designated" means - it's more positive than yes, so setting motor_vehicle=designated when the signs forbid motor vehicles is strange.

Jon

Apologies - I see you fixed it in changeset/149034089

Hi!

The name of way/245481602 was changed from "Wade Road" to "∑∑" - was this intentional?

Jon

Hi!

Is way/1258585957 a "biergarten in the Bavarian sense" (amenity=biergarten) separate to the adjacent pub, or outdoor seating typical of a British pub (leisure=outdoor_seating)?

amenity=biergarten?uselang=en-GB
leisure=outdoor_seating

Jon

hi!

When adding road bridges, they should be joined with the sections of road that are tagged as bridge=yes
man_made=bridge

e.g. way/1254369201 should be joined to node/1133882521 and node/21453411

Jon

oops - sorry, I see someone else added it to the name!

Hi!

The reference numbers for rights of way should go under "prow_ref" rather than "name" prow%20ref=*?uselang=en-GB

Jon

This article explains the tagging for on-road cycle lanes that are not physically segregated from motor traffic:-
cycleway=lane

hi!

You added way/1246444982 - a cycleway parallel to way/162735621 which already had the necessary cycleway tags on it. I'll remove the duplicate.

Jon

I get the impression the councils (Woking and Surrey) plus Sustrans didn't consider the impact of the redevelopment of the town centre on the cycling routes or the need to put up signs (the Pluto LCN has been broken for years after the fire station moved).

Hello.

This edit made changes to the node node/278525 (part of a road in England). I assume the changes should have been made to relation/278525 (a hotel in France) so I have transferred the changes there.

Jon

Je suis désolé mais je ne parle pas français - j'ai transféré des données incorrectement dans changeset/145521928 de node/278525 à relation/278525

Hello conifermapper.

"South Manydown" is the section south of the railway line - the section north of the railway line is just "Manydown". I'm also not sure that construction has started yet, especially on such a large area - the first area to be built was only given approval this month.

Jon