Hi,
The "name" tag is not to be used for describing an object. I have removed the name tag on node #5748195962.
See osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for more details

This changeset has been reverted in changeset #125579933 due to suspicion of vandalism.

This changeset has been reverted in changeset #125579933 due to suspicion of vandalism.

Looks good to me!
Next time try square the buildings to make them look nicer. You can do this by pressing Q in iD when the building is selected.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125561052

Looks good to me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125561026

Hi,
Please try to keep changesets local or at least a bit smaller. Changeset bboxes this large spam the history feed and make checking other people's edits hard.
See this for more details : osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Thank you and have a nice day!

Hi,
What is the source of this mapping?
jmarchon

1) I wouldn't call service=driveway2 banned, just deprecated. If someone has a better tag for it, they are welcome to fix it, in my opinion.
2) Yes, if they really know what they are doing, as the wiki states.
3) I trust ZeLonewolf to have followed the proper procedures, as they are a very experienced mapper. I am not, so this is all my opinion.

service=driveway2 is labeled as deprecated, and a possible tagging mistake in the wiki. Therefore, I think it is reasonable to be removing those tags. The wiki states the automated edits should only be done by people who really know what they are doing. I trust ZeLonewolf to be doing it correctly.

I would agree that service=driveway2 is nonsense. At least until someone documents in the wiki its meaning and intended usage.

Ok, thank you.

*merge

Hi,
Have these changes been made to reflect the school remodel mentioned in note #3097195?

Wrong changeset comment. I added a restaurant from a note.

Oops! The changeset comment is supposed to say"landuse".

The lake outline is in the wrong place, not the buildings. I just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet.

Mapping temporary road closures due to construction like this is discouraged. Please use conditional restrictions instead: osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Please do not hesitate to ask me for assistance if needed.

Why did you remove the access tags on way/155846919?

Hi,
I have talked with the OSM Discord community, and checked the OSM Wiki. Both say that highway=service together with area=yes is valid tagging.
"area=yes on a highway=* describes a routable highway area on which the dedicated traffic can route omnidirectionally, i.e. from any point along the edge to any other. This is typical for pedestrian areas, or service areas where vehicles drive without prescribed lanes."

In my strong opinion, it is correct in this case. I have been in this area and looked at this spot many times. Unless you have also surveyed this area, or have some other, more reliable source, I will revert this change.

Thank you, have a nice day, and happy mapping!

Hi,
The previous tags on way #1071703626 were correct, in my opinion. What is your reasoning behind changing them to "place=square"?