OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
43741136 about 9 years ago

Why did you retag this as a tram line? "Light rail" is literally right there in the name.

43753802 about 9 years ago

Hi Xavier, removed some of the tags for now because I don't think they should be displayed as stations until the line is actually open.

43552256 about 9 years ago

What the hell are you doing? This is a publicly-viewable map updated in real time, not your own personal play area where you can mess with stuff as you please.

43438401 about 9 years ago

I'll be reverting you again, not because I don't care of your opinion about this but because it's inconsistent to only modify the names of some of the stations.

43438401 about 9 years ago

See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52852/railway-stationmetro-station-naming

43438401 about 9 years ago

Not entirely relevant; as an example, this way/194259723 has station signage "OXFORD CIRCUS STATION", but is still marked on the Tube map and in OSM as "Oxford Circus".

43438401 about 9 years ago

Usually railway stations don't contain "station" in their name; this information is already in the "railway=station" tag (see tagging example of railway=station).

42655407 about 9 years ago

I also just picked this changeset to comment on because it was the most recent one when I noticed that he'd made a lot of changesets.

42655407 about 9 years ago

@SomeoneElse I've messaged HelioFelix informing him of the help.osm.org thread, but he hasn't replied yet. Looking at the Cycle layer, 9.8m seems plausible given that Fanling new town is situated in a largely-flat valley.

42635683 about 9 years ago

I've asked the wider community for clarification: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52388/lots-of-peaks-close-together

42635683 about 9 years ago

Yeah, it does look a bit weird… they are all technically peaks, though. I guess you could prevent them from rendering by just deleting natural=peak (without removing the data)?

42635683 about 9 years ago

I will be reverting the 15 of your changesets, where you (for some reason I don't know) removed elevation data from peaks and troughs, at some point

42655407 about 9 years ago

Where did you get the idea that this was an invalid tag?

42635683 about 9 years ago

Hi, you seem to have removed a lot of valid data by HelioFelix. The tags were "ele=*" and "natural=peak", which are both valid. I don't know what you're seeing.

42543106 about 9 years ago

(JOSM ticket #13742 https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13742 filed.)

42543106 about 9 years ago

I've updated the wiki page.

42543106 about 9 years ago

changeset/42579713. Note that JOSM gives me an error for that value; not sure if it's intended.

42543106 about 9 years ago

See lanes:psv=*. Should it be changed to refer to lanes:psv:conditional?

42543106 about 9 years ago

Well, it's what the wiki said… I'll change it then. Thanks.

42375949 about 9 years ago

Oh, okay then – sorry about that. New mappers can often copy copyrighted maps without realising that it's not allowed. Still, might be good for you to read the tutorial if you haven't already.