OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
155400260 5 months ago

What's up with the construction zone on the west side of Old Windsor Road? It's just a copse of trees. Is there some sign that it's a construction site?

168210913 6 months ago

Submitted this changeset comment without thinking about it; it should say that I added chicanes.

163820327 9 months ago

Oh cheers, did that with the last payphone I added but it totally slipped my mind here. Thanks for fixing.

163668718 9 months ago

G'day,

Please make your changesets comments more descriptive. "Added new data" tells people nothing about what your changeset does. A better comment might have been something like "added footpaths and fences" (although I can see you also did more than that).

Cheers

160627194 10 months ago

Hello, I have removed the hundred or so shrub nodes that you added for the hedges and replaced them with a way. Hedges shouldn't be mapped as discrete nodes but as ways (barrier=hedge). While technically a hedge is made up of discrete shrubs, it isn't reasonable (or often possible) to verify the existence of the individual shrubs even on the ground, let alone from aerial imagery. It's also just more functionally useful to map it as a way.

162914132 10 months ago

Oh dear. Silly me! Too many tabs open. Ta

162914132 10 months ago

Hello, I have removed the hundred or so shrub nodes that you added for the hedges and replaced them with a way. Hedges shouldn't be mapped as discrete nodes but as ways (barrier=hedge). While technically a hedge is made up of discrete shrubs, it isn't reasonable (or often possible) to verify the existence of the individual shrubs even on the ground, let alone from aerial imagery. It's also just more functionally useful to map it as a way.

162804346 10 months ago

If the buildings aren't egregiously wrong I would certainly not remove them from the map even if they may not be as high quality as anyone would like.

Obviously at a certain point data could become bad enough that you might consider it vandalism, at which point removing them would be justified. But I that obviously isn't the case here, and it would be a good idea to discuss this with other mappers before making a deletion.

If you don't feel existing building outlines are good enough, you should improve them yourself, rather than deleting them. It preserves the data and also importantly the history of the object.

160478235 12 months ago

Nie zauważyłam że był tam pojedynczy stojak. Dziś poszłam sprawdzić, teraz poprawione. Dzięki za uwagę.

160478235 12 months ago

Myślę że obok. Nie zauważyłam stacji metroroweru, pamiętam tylko że jest tam 5 stojaków. Jutro mogę wrócić i jeszcze potwierdzić jaka jest faktyczna sytuacja.