Hi, I'm curious why you would delete the old building way here and then add a new one of lesser quality (e.g. not orthogonalized) ?https://osmcha.org/changesets/84949544/

It should be 'Tiburon' not Triburon, right? way/10561657#map=17/35.26080/-120.62886&layers=D

thanks, Ian. I missed that one

I've reported this user

Hey GallonWater/Tom ...stop vandalizing!

Why was the name changed to "Tom's Weiner Shop"?

I think "address is not populating" because the name tag will override address tag.

Please take a look at tagging with the 'access' key access=* ...these _are_ still physical features, but it's up to whomever is rendering the data _how_ that data gets 'drawn'/rendered. If an app uses OSM data, it should make a distinction on trail segments that are 'private' etc. or not render them at all.

Fair points! But I really think that this should be discussed before outright deleting features. I also think that until the trail is physically blocked or altered on the ground - that these are legitimate features to include on the map. Perhaps their tags can be modified - have you explored doing that? Proceeding with revert

I will be reverting the deletion of this data. I understand your concern, but the physical features on the ground are what the Forest Service is worried about - not a digital map. Until things change - this map is a correct representation of what is on the ground...and many of us have put in a lot of time mapping it.

I'm not sure that is valid reasoning to remove this data. Please stop deleting the data. I think this changeset possibly warrants a revert. Have you broached this topic elsewhere? Is there another discussion happening that one can follow?

Thanks for the reply. SLO Jon and I have moved this discussion to a message.