OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
84949544 over 5 years ago

Hi, I'm curious why you would delete the old building way here and then add a new one of lesser quality (e.g. not orthogonalized) ?https://osmcha.org/changesets/84949544/

78853620 almost 6 years ago

It should be 'Tiburon' not Triburon, right? way/10561657#map=17/35.26080/-120.62886&layers=D

76937386 about 6 years ago

thanks, Ian. I missed that one

76858515 about 6 years ago

I've reported this user

76858515 about 6 years ago

Hey GallonWater/Tom ...stop vandalizing!

75338503 about 6 years ago

Why was the name changed to "Tom's Weiner Shop"?

71157650 over 6 years ago

I think "address is not populating" because the name tag will override address tag.

57190122 almost 8 years ago

Please take a look at tagging with the 'access' key access=* ...these _are_ still physical features, but it's up to whomever is rendering the data _how_ that data gets 'drawn'/rendered. If an app uses OSM data, it should make a distinction on trail segments that are 'private' etc. or not render them at all.

57190122 almost 8 years ago

Fair points! But I really think that this should be discussed before outright deleting features. I also think that until the trail is physically blocked or altered on the ground - that these are legitimate features to include on the map. Perhaps their tags can be modified - have you explored doing that? Proceeding with revert

57190122 almost 8 years ago

I will be reverting the deletion of this data. I understand your concern, but the physical features on the ground are what the Forest Service is worried about - not a digital map. Until things change - this map is a correct representation of what is on the ground...and many of us have put in a lot of time mapping it.

57190122 almost 8 years ago

I'm not sure that is valid reasoning to remove this data. Please stop deleting the data. I think this changeset possibly warrants a revert. Have you broached this topic elsewhere? Is there another discussion happening that one can follow?

55309000 almost 8 years ago

Thanks for the reply. SLO Jon and I have moved this discussion to a message.

55309000 almost 8 years ago

why should it be removed?

53602659 about 8 years ago

at a quick glance, looks good to me

53468180 about 8 years ago

good catch, @dave_in_ag. I have reverted this changeset changeset/53490417

53305804 about 8 years ago

looks good - thanks!

53219528 about 8 years ago

😍 nice!

53184855 about 8 years ago

This looks fantastic - thank you!

50706322 over 8 years ago

Interesting! I didn't know about this route. Thanks 👍

50116764 over 8 years ago

Hi cjohn105 and karitotp. Yes, welcome to OSM, cjohn105. It looks like you have digitizing tracks that perhaps fire equipment made during the suppression of a wildfire, sometime around 2011 ... as per this source tms:http://gis.slocounty.ca.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Aerials/2011_Combined_WGSWMAS/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}

I understand you're new to OSM and working with somebody locally to learn - but this likely is not appropriate to add to the map and should be removed.

Thank you karitotp for commenting. Regards, Joe