j03lar50n's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 84949544 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I'm curious why you would delete the old building way here and then add a new one of lesser quality (e.g. not orthogonalized) ?https://osmcha.org/changesets/84949544/ |
| 78853620 | almost 6 years ago | It should be 'Tiburon' not Triburon, right? way/10561657#map=17/35.26080/-120.62886&layers=D |
| 76937386 | about 6 years ago | thanks, Ian. I missed that one |
| 76858515 | about 6 years ago | I've reported this user |
| 76858515 | about 6 years ago | Hey GallonWater/Tom ...stop vandalizing! |
| 75338503 | about 6 years ago | Why was the name changed to "Tom's Weiner Shop"? |
| 71157650 | over 6 years ago | I think "address is not populating" because the name tag will override address tag. |
| 57190122 | almost 8 years ago | Please take a look at tagging with the 'access' key access=* ...these _are_ still physical features, but it's up to whomever is rendering the data _how_ that data gets 'drawn'/rendered. If an app uses OSM data, it should make a distinction on trail segments that are 'private' etc. or not render them at all. |
| 57190122 | almost 8 years ago | Fair points! But I really think that this should be discussed before outright deleting features. I also think that until the trail is physically blocked or altered on the ground - that these are legitimate features to include on the map. Perhaps their tags can be modified - have you explored doing that? Proceeding with revert |
| 57190122 | almost 8 years ago | I will be reverting the deletion of this data. I understand your concern, but the physical features on the ground are what the Forest Service is worried about - not a digital map. Until things change - this map is a correct representation of what is on the ground...and many of us have put in a lot of time mapping it. |
| 57190122 | almost 8 years ago | I'm not sure that is valid reasoning to remove this data. Please stop deleting the data. I think this changeset possibly warrants a revert. Have you broached this topic elsewhere? Is there another discussion happening that one can follow? |
| 55309000 | almost 8 years ago | Thanks for the reply. SLO Jon and I have moved this discussion to a message. |
| 55309000 | almost 8 years ago | why should it be removed? |
| 53602659 | about 8 years ago | at a quick glance, looks good to me |
| 53468180 | about 8 years ago | good catch, @dave_in_ag. I have reverted this changeset changeset/53490417 |
| 53305804 | about 8 years ago | looks good - thanks! |
| 53219528 | about 8 years ago | 😍 nice! |
| 53184855 | about 8 years ago | This looks fantastic - thank you! |
| 50706322 | over 8 years ago | Interesting! I didn't know about this route. Thanks 👍 |
| 50116764 | over 8 years ago | Hi cjohn105 and karitotp. Yes, welcome to OSM, cjohn105. It looks like you have digitizing tracks that perhaps fire equipment made during the suppression of a wildfire, sometime around 2011 ... as per this source tms:http://gis.slocounty.ca.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Aerials/2011_Combined_WGSWMAS/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x} I understand you're new to OSM and working with somebody locally to learn - but this likely is not appropriate to add to the map and should be removed. Thank you karitotp for commenting. Regards, Joe |