Would you mind identifying the nodes you talk about and clarifying what the "mixed types" are as well?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153350022

I actually edited route 113, not 115. There was a mistake in writing the changeset comment.

Great. I'm sure my new changes i.e. changeset/131953074 will make Astridinkatu routing possible in the meanwhile.

I still believe it was oneway like that at the time of mapping. Right now, I can't say if that's the case any more. I see now that originally it was announced to be until November (https://kruunusillat.fi/kruunuvuorenranta/haakoninlahdenkatu-muuttuu-yksisuuntaiseksi-12-7/) which is contrary to me seeing oneway signs in January 2023.

I don't think there is such a restriction so I went ahead and removed it.

I removed that turn restriction, it is no longer in effect.

Oh, I mistyped Espoonlahti in the changeset comment, in case anyone is wondering.

Hi. Those ways were tagged highway=platform which does not imply motorised vehicle use at all, the relevant documentation being the osm wiki [ highway=platform?uselang=en ]. I'm sorry but it would seem that you were mislead by how the platform looked like a "highway" in the editing view.

I'm going to change those ways back the way they were before, because I find that highway=platform is suitable.

This has been reverted as vandalism.

Kadun nimenmuutosta ei ole tapahtunut, joten kumosin muokkauksesi.

Correction: The metro overpass in the woods is not called Alakivenkuja. Hence I left it unnamed.

^ I meant the Munkkiniemenbaana relation.

i.e. the large MALMIN LENTOASEMA sign at the Tattariharjuntie end of this street is a direction sign. It only tells us that the street goes to a place called Malmin lentoasema. The street itself is left unnamed. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=929339627842607

Kiitos. Kirjaan tähän ylös vielä sen – jos joku kolmas osapuoli sattuu miettimään – miksei Larmax tai minä poistanut tuota kohdetta
way/1023907604 niin sehän ei olekaan pyöräkaista vaan pyörätie ja se on oikein merkitty.

Linkitän vielä tärkeän tietolähteeni (Mapillary). Kuva on Tupasaarentieltä, ja oikeassa reunassa näkyy jalkakäytävä-merkki sekä sen lisäkilpi, joka kertoo vaikutusalueen ulottuvan molempiin suuntiin, oikealle ja vasemmalle. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=495978268316691

(Korjaus: ei metsässä vaan puistossa.)

Ilmeisesti suunnitellaan, että suojatien poisto jää pysyväksi. Asia selvisi minulle vuorovaikutusmuistiosta, joka liittyy Lauttasaarentien katusuunnitelmaan. Se on saatavilla kaupungin sivuilta: https://www.hel.fi/kaupunkiymparisto/fi/julkaisut-ja-aineistot/ilmoitukset/katu-ja-puistosuunnitelmat/lauttasaari-031121

Valitettavasti tämä käyttäjä on jatkanut häiriköintiä samalla kaavalla ja Larmaxin revertin jälkeen toistanut tiennimimuutoksen: changeset/112492593

Dear MelusBou, the source you have used may be too old, leading you to make inappropriate changes to Kiertomäentie.

I drove past this road entrance just a few days ago and saw a row of bollards that you claimed are not there. The node node/7684446674 should not have been removed.

This edit is a revert of my revert. The comment at changeset/110631700 still stands. Driving a car through here is not possible because of a physical barrier. Also, driving a car or motorcycle through here is illegal because of the traffic sign that is here. I plan to revert this edit, too.

Dear Joni, this changeset is too large as it covers large areas in Norway, Sweden and Finland. (I'm referring to the orange box that you see when you open this page: changeset/110678398 ). Please edit a small area at a time. This might mean uploading a single node, if your next edit will be hundreds of kilometers away.

So, please finalize and upload your changes before moving far away. It will make the “History” panel easier to understand for all mappers who are monitoring their local areas. osm.wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

Best regards, j