impiaaa's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136373193 | over 2 years ago | Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another area, so that the changeset size is small.
|
| 136220150 | over 2 years ago | Please read the documentation on the format of address tags: addr:*=* The street name must exactly match the name of the street nearby (so, no abbreviations). |
| 136041132 | over 2 years ago | Please use the changeset message to describe what you changed and why, for example "Added building outlines in Cloverdale from aerial imagery." There are more examples here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, please save your changes in one area before moving to another, to keep the changeset box small and easy to review. |
| 135914996 | over 2 years ago | I've restored the two trails that this changeset deleted, and added access=no to indicate they're inaccessible. Only objects that have no evidence of existing should be deleted from OpenStreetMap. |
| 135820717 | over 2 years ago | Please use the changeset message to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added an urgent care clinic." See here for more examples: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Also, when a business location has closed, please only delete the business information from the node without deleting the node, so that the address information is still accurate. |
| 135672834 | over 2 years ago | The two bottom parts really lost a lot of roundness… |
| 135593095 | over 2 years ago | Thanks! |
| 135593095 | over 2 years ago | The original point had a unit number: 5968 Silver Creek Valley Road Unit 20. The location of that unit number within the building is still useful information even if the business at that address has closed. |
| 135593095 | over 2 years ago | If a place has closed but the address still exists it's better to keep the object and just remove any business tags, so that the address doesn't have to be re-added |
| 135409677 | over 2 years ago | Please describe what you changed and why in the changeset message. For example, "Added road name." Here is a link with more guidance and examples: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 135340854 | over 2 years ago | As I understand it, the "covered" tag simply indicates that some type of cover exists over top a road segment. It's still necessary to describe *what* is on top of each part of the map, and in what order, and the "layer" tag should be used for that. So I feel like the prior tagging was correct. |
| 135363897 | over 2 years ago | For this one you've tagged the whole office building with data center tags, but it looks like there are other offices inside as well. If so I think it would be better to keep the data center tags on a node or maybe a indoor=floor. |
| 135278794 | over 2 years ago | Please don't connect landuse areas directly to highways, it's inaccurate and difficult to edit. landuse=residential#Separation_from_roads |
| 134824273 | over 2 years ago | Are you sure about this? I was under the impression that highway=busway is only for BRT roads, and service=busway should still be used for bus-only service roads, like the ones here. |
| 134551170 | over 2 years ago | Copying data from Google Maps, including Street View, is illegal: osm.wiki/Google |
| 134533251 | over 2 years ago | I've deleted your contribution. Spam is not welcome in OpenStreetMap. |
| 134363642 | over 2 years ago | It's often better to just remove the tags of a closed business rather than delete the point entirely, since some information like the address might still be relevant. |
| 134396620 | over 2 years ago | Welcome, and thanks for your contribution! |
| 134192699 | over 2 years ago | Please respond to my previous comment before continuing. You need to have a descriptive changeset message, and MVPD organizational boundaries are inappropriate for OSM. |
| 134157880 | over 2 years ago | Please use the changeset description to explain what you changed and why. There's some advice on this page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|