OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
120532608 over 3 years ago

Thanks

120469408 over 3 years ago

The street name is incorrect. addr:street must match the name of a street nearby, and not include the number (which goes in addr:housenumber). osm.wiki/Addresses Additionally, you need to use the changeset comment to describe what you changed; "update" is not enough. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

120354165 over 3 years ago

In changeset/120350812, you dragged the restaurant node away from its original location, but this changeset deletes it entirely. I restored the node to its original location with changeset/120392764. In the future it might help to go to the node and view its history, to see what changed. osmcha.org can also help visualizing changes.

120186848 over 3 years ago

Please use more descriptive changeset messages. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Like, what did you add, and where? Additionally, try to save your changes in one local area before moving on to another one.

120207769 over 3 years ago

Please write more descriptive changeset comments. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, try to save your changes in one local area before moving somewhere else.

120171765 over 3 years ago

OpenStreetMap is a shared map for everybody where everybody must follow the tagging standards. Spam is not welcome.

120171765 over 3 years ago

Reverted in changeset 120171765

119972203 over 3 years ago

Other mappers would appreciate it if you wrote more detailed changeset descriptions, so that they could know what was changed without having to look into the details. For example, "Added addresses". See also osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

119757789 over 3 years ago

Reverted in changeset/119765007

119757789 over 3 years ago

In addition to the duplicate data (which is against the "Don't put data on top of data" import guideline), the "phone" and "description" tags are not properly formatted. Because of these issues, it's clear that the data did not go through manual review before uploading. That may be allowed after agreement from the community, but clearly that agreement was not reached either. Manual review after uploading is not acceptable, since it adds bad data to the live database.

119757789 over 3 years ago

Please follow the import guidelines: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
In particular:
- Document the import
- Link the documentation in the changeset comment
- Notify the imports mailing list
- Wait for a week for feedback from the local community
- Do not damage the live database
In addition, this changeset violates general guidelines around changeset size.

119572116 over 3 years ago

Our local mapping style is to move the outdated information to old_name=*, destroyed:*=*, and shop=vacant, and keep any still-relevant information, including the address.

119572116 over 3 years ago

By deleting the node entirely, you've removed valuable information from the map, like the location of the street address. Instead of deleting, please either move the outdated information (e.g. to old_name=*, destroyed:*=*, shop=vacant), or remove only the outdated tags.

119408605 over 3 years ago

When making changes, other editors will appreciate if save your changes in one local area first before moving on to another one. In this changeset, you added a shop in LA, but also changed a Muni station in San Francisco, so in the history view, it looks like you edited the whole state of California. Thanks!

119364430 over 3 years ago

Please use more descriptive changeset comments. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

119277134 over 3 years ago

Thank you!

119277134 over 3 years ago

Deleting and re-drawing the buildings like this has removed information from the map, like the overhang in front of Back Bar, the extension to the side, the height and elevation of the building, and the history of the component nodes (osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history ). A better way to do it might be to keep the building outline while you trace the parts, or to split it into segments and re-join them. JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ ) also has plugins to make some of these operations easier (split area, replace geometry, revert tool).

118966057 over 3 years ago

This isn't a duplicate. The only other address point at 5540 Winfield has a unit number of 100, making it distinct. Additionally, the point you deleted had tags indicating that it was a vacant shop. The point should remain so that the next shop to move in can use the existing address point.

118570251 almost 4 years ago

Please use more detailed changeset comments. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

118219572 almost 4 years ago

It's usually better to edit the building outline rather than delete and re-map, see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history . In this case you've also deleted the address of the building without adding it back.