OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
61753670 over 6 years ago

That's odd. I thought that if SNCF Mobilités were merely running trains on the network, then they could not be listed as an operator.

68367743 over 6 years ago

There is no ULEZ charge if a diesel vehicle meets the Euro 6 standard, and that is why the charge applies to vehicles below Euro 6.

68367743 over 6 years ago

I will change that, but I had to improvise the values because the key doesn't document conditional charges properly, and I don't think we ever had access rules based on emission standards.

66443000 almost 7 years ago

Hi, I think I have done my best to portray the road condition (surface and smoothness) despite the current policy being that villages be linked by at least one tertiary road. If you like, I can change the smoothness to "very_bad" instead of "bad".

67825917 almost 7 years ago

Hi there, I have done the north of the city, and added the necessary editing notes there to clear up any confusion for others. I happened to have enough time today.

67813467 almost 7 years ago

I am sorry about that. I will get onto it in the next changeset. I will say it is Bing, based on the OSBL.

67387631 almost 7 years ago

Hi there, I think the name:UN=* tag may no longer be needed. The now-obsolete FYROM name could go to old_name:UN=* and local language variants.

66963145 almost 7 years ago

Dang! It was supposed to be DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery as the source.

36331012 almost 7 years ago

Hi, it's a named junction.

66443316 almost 7 years ago

Why you downgrade roads between villages and hamlets to a dirt road? The current consensus is to connect all villages and hamlets with a tertiary road, and using surface=* and smoothness=* to describe the condition.

62822924 about 7 years ago

Source for the above message: way/32502470/history.

62822924 about 7 years ago

George_ath actually came up with this scheme.

62790017 about 7 years ago

Hi, with all due respect, it is not that we do not like you, but in order for OSM to succeed we have to follow consensus, otherwise the map would be too messy and unusable. If you want to propose a change to a standard, you should ask in the forums or the wiki, rather than just editing the whole data yourself and leaving the wider community confused or unreasonably suspicious.

62790017 about 7 years ago

I have read them, but that is not enough of evidence to justify the change. The bottom line is you are doing this without the consensus of the community.

62790017 about 7 years ago

Please see my reply at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=716746#p716746.

62792032 about 7 years ago

Hi, only the A8 east of the Korinthos interchange is part of the E94 European road. Source: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vylF_ZADdYCOnrdxWcyuHA

62790017 about 7 years ago

I believe that both ΕΟ and Ε.Ο. are equally valid, but when we really started to streamline the roads on OSM, ΕΟ appeared to be the dominant format and thus I merely went along with it.

62790017 about 7 years ago

Yes, the dot. If OpenStreetMap for Garmin is making the initials appear like Eo, then it is the software developer that should fix it, not us.

62790017 about 7 years ago

You are still going against consensus on the road numbers.

62477320 over 7 years ago

Okay. I do data validation from time to time.