Changesets 157551496 and 157552092 were reverted because the former had an insufficient changeset comment, and the latter replaced well-mapped ways with those with much less information.

changeset/157560876

Road names (such as way/30125356) are not in all-caps on OpenStreetMap, despite what the signage shows. We use mixed case with monotonic diacritics that were officially adopted in 1982.

I reverted these changesets because they do not reflect reality and classification schemes agreed by the community.

changeset/157523936

I reverted these changesets because they do not reflect reality and classification schemes agreed by the community.

changeset/157523936

I reverted these changesets because they do not reflect reality and classification schemes agreed by the community.

changeset/157523936

This changeset had to be reverted because the classifications did not reflect reality.

I am getting concerned about this changeset, where you decided to delete and replace a lot of ways instead of just updating them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157462343

If I recall correctly, the link road over the A5 has a central reservation. Why did you merge those ways?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157467947

Also, naming consistency … you know, the "[Type] [Number]: [Start] → [End]" format according to route=train, except Unicode allows real arrows to be used?

The EO51 doesn't go to Ormenio according to the 1963 decree as described at osm.wiki/Greece/National_Road_Network. What's the source confirming the change?

I forgot, can you please explain why they should be presented as if they were open?

In this changeset, some of the roads you added, such as way/1306005036 and way/1306005057, do not exist any more or are about to be dismantled. These slip roads are similar to the fictional slip roads added by Delta Evas ALL.

Part of the road at way/1305972248 may not be clear enough to be mapped. Please explain.

Can you please explain why you deleted the etymology tags, as you appeared to have done at way/299863943? I am also concerned that you may be repeating the vague and all-caps changeset comments like what Delta Evas ALL did.

What source did you use to demonstrate that the bridge has fully reopened?

I think this is something we haven't properly defined because there is no documentation about variable lane layouts at toll plazas, and the barriers look very movable unlike the bollards on the EO9 (source: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1747333549086334). I think we should take this question to the forum, with you starting the topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68. My personal recommendation is to make a distinction between fixed and movable barriers when deciding whether to split or merge the ways.

Sadly, I do not think it is a good idea to split the ways at the toll plaza, mainly because there are reversible lanes, like on the Aston Expressway in Birmingham. I think that we could describe the layout of the merged toll plaza way with lanes:forward=*, lanes:backward=* and lanes:reversible=*.

Sorry if I sounded harsh this afternoon. I am trying hard to put myself back together after I caught Delta Evas ALL doing the same broken edits last night.

Please stop splitting the ways at toll stations because most of them have reversible lanes.

There is no dual carriageway under the rail freight depot. Why do you keep adding fictional road layouts?