I don't know why it uploaded with this comment, was adding stuff from my recent trip to Roper Lake

Hi; I'm just coming across this now, but I think this is an incorrect use of the amenity=parking tag; as described on amenity=parking , that tag is intended for marking whole lots, not individual regions of parking within a lot. I believe you may be looking for a level of detail more like amenity=parking_space (which is suitable for both mapping spaces individually and mapping blocks of equivalent spaces at once)

I'm not entirely sure I agree with the method, but this makes sure a redaction wouldn't silently remove correct names, at least. Of course, it's still removing accurate information, but I'll personally take it over a nearly-silent DWG redaction.

I don't know why JOSM gave me that changeset message, I'm just tracing stuff here.

Drove by here today and saw this! Thanks for your detailed mapping, and welcome to OSM. I think I saw a sign there which labeled it the "Midvale Park Fitness Corner", though -- I wasn't sure where you got the name you used from, or which name would be a better choice.

One other small comment (though not strictly related to this changeset) -- it's usually seen as best practices to connect the footways to the road where you'd get onto them (so I think Midvale Park Road in this case). This way, routing engines which care about walking can know where you can get between the road and the footpath.

Again, welcome and thanks for the mapping!