ian727's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149520763 | over 1 year ago | "Höchstädt und Thierstein zu Gemeinden gemacht"... ...mit der Folge, dass die beiden Namen nun gar nicht mehr auf der Karte auftauchen. Ist das Sinn der Sache? |
| 144960737 | over 1 year ago | Moin, du hast in diesem Changeset den Radweg in der Schönholzer Heide als "highway=service" getaggt. Ich denke nicht, dass diese Klassifizierung korrekt ist - siehe dazu den OSM-Wiki-Artikel auf Deutsch oder Englisch. |
| 148854498 | almost 2 years ago | Alles klar, danke fürs Korrigieren! |
| 148854498 | almost 2 years ago | Construction didn't even start yet. This should - if even - be mapped as railway=proposed. |
| 14213843 | almost 2 years ago | Warum denn service und nicht residential? |
| 138060282 | about 2 years ago | Hi, thanks for the response. Let me quote something you wrote in a comment of another changeset of yours: "Given that in these countries National Roads (RN, NR or N, depending on country) are the most important roads, then trunk should be the most apropriate tag for these." This is an incorrect assumption. In the DRC, if a road is classified as a national road, this does not automatically imply that this road is important. The classification of the road network in the DRC was done in the 1980s, based on maps that might even have been outdated back then already. There are many stretches of national or provincial roads that are completely abandoned and not usable. Their mapping and tagging should occur carefully and individually, with local knowledge or at least highly likely assumptions based on satellite imagery or other information. I would highly discourage mass edits like yours. If you want to change a road's tag, carefully look at each section of this road and verify your assumptions before doing so. |
| 138060282 | about 2 years ago | Hey, I am wondering if it is really helpful to classify these as "trunk roads". Yes, they are national roads, but in the DRC that does - in many cases - not mean that the roads are even usbale without a 4x4 vehicle. Especially the RN9 has as far as I know never been maintained. |
| 143161654 | about 2 years ago | This is definitely not a secondary road! Please read highway=* to learn how to use the highway key! |
| 143164855 | about 2 years ago | This is definitely not a secondary road! Please read highway=* to learn how to use the highway key! |
| 143161573 | about 2 years ago | This is definitely not a secondary road! Please read highway=* to learn how to use the highway key! |
| 132978934 | almost 3 years ago | This changeset apparently "deleted" the park (probably a hole in the relation or something). Please fix. |
| 115696928 | about 3 years ago | Alles klar, danke! |
| 115696928 | about 3 years ago | Hi, ich habe gesehen, dass du diverse Wege in der Schönholzer Heide mit "bicycles=no" getaggt hast. Gibt's dafür eine rechtliche Grundlage oder worauf basiert das? Immerhin fahren da tagtäglich Leute auf Fahrrädern lang... |
| 115708021 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, I've already been contacted by other mappers about my mapping style. Some years ago, I had been told by another mapper that "double parallel lines" should be avoided at all cost, so I got used to using relations for nearly all kinds of areas. I never realized (until now) that this way of mapping is pretty difficult for other mappers to retrace or to follow. I'll make some changed to my edits, trying to simplify things a little bit. |
| 115652105 | almost 4 years ago | Danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Ich schreibe dir ggf. nochmal eine PM mit weiteren Fragen, weil ich mir jetzt nicht mehr ganz sicher bin, wie ich bestimmte "areas" dann mappen soll. Schonmal als Vorwarnung: Wenn du MPs nicht magst, wirst du bei meinen anderen Edits erst recht die Krise kriegen. Ich höre jetzt erstmal mit dem Mapping auf, bis ich Klarheit habe. Sorry für die Umstände. |
| 115652105 | almost 4 years ago | Da scheiden sich wohl die Geister. Als ich vor ein par Jahren noch ohne MPs gemappt habe, kamen gleich die Nachrichten à la: "Uahh, bitte überschneidende Linien unbedingt vermeiden, MPs benutzen!". Jetzt nutze ich MPs und mache es natürlich wieder nicht allen recht. Was wäre denn "best practice"? |
| 99225237 | over 4 years ago | Tracks cannot be verified by sat imagery |
| 98042138 | over 4 years ago | Cannot verify those track in any way. |
| 84164895 | over 5 years ago | Wrong classification. This is not a highway. Ce n'est pas une autoroute! |
| 84481767 | over 5 years ago | Wrong classification. This is not a highway. Ce n'est pas une autoroute! |