h551w's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131130282 | almost 3 years ago | Looks like it. At least that one I can't blame on decade-ago me! It also looks like it got named in OSM before TIGER fixed the spelling in 2019 |
| 130735383 | almost 3 years ago | Hoping they'll be willing to let this one slide |
| 130628109 | about 3 years ago | Survey and GPS only apply to north of Ustick. I also only added proposed roads through to phase 2, since the next phase will presumably only begin once everything here has finished construction |
| 130311810 | about 3 years ago | I suppose so, I've been away for long enough that both Maxar's and Esri's imagery is new to me |
| 121996381 | about 3 years ago | Yeah, I was probably a little overzealous with adding some of them |
| 121740457 | about 3 years ago | I don't know for certain, but I at least haven't seen anything change between being added to the map and road construction finishing |
| 122641714 | about 3 years ago | I thought that was weird too, but that's how the sign at the intersection of Clement and Mountain View that's visible on Streetside spells it, and Boise's open data map agrees with it 🤷♀️ |
| 118142681 | about 3 years ago | Ah, looks like that wouldn't be visible from the street level imagery I referenced. Definitely feel free to update it here |
| 117140453 | about 3 years ago | Just went back and checked the picture I'd taken for reference for it and it doesn't appear to be an LFL one (no plaque or anything) |
| 115325503 | about 3 years ago | Good catch, fixed it! |
| 121995208 | over 3 years ago | I just double-checked the reference pictures I took of the signage and, yep, it is apparently. Definitely some weird inconsistent naming going on in this area |
| 118990266 | over 3 years ago | Huh, that would make way more sense than Delehaye, but that's what the road signs had last time I was there in March. I wonder why they changed it |
| 122048977 | over 3 years ago | Oh, yep you're right, that's a subtle distinction. I've reverted that |
| 120866302 | over 3 years ago | I had originally had these as paths with designated bicycle access since ITD describes them as "multi-use pathways" and there are some (though not extensive) facilities for bikes along the route. I'm not sure what tagging best describes this kind of pathway, but these (and most other 8 or 10' wide pathways I've encountered) at least officially are built to include bicycle use. |
| 118991584 | over 3 years ago | Ah, yeah I'd never checked whether this was residential or not. I've just now updated them to residential roads |
| 118933973 | almost 4 years ago | Yeah, this just seems like such a needlessly hostile design |
| 118076872 | almost 4 years ago | This changeset should have been titled something like "Adding Stoddard Pathway extension" but I think I walked away and after I came back I forgot I hadn't uploaded that yet before noticing the road segment classification |
| 117701205 | almost 4 years ago | Oooh, new Bing! |
| 117500721 | almost 4 years ago | Yep, that looks right! Their site even uses Mapbox for their embedded map, nice |
| 117416916 | almost 4 years ago | It's hard trying to date this imagery too. Comparing with some survey pictures I took, some areas are Aug/Sept 2021 (Delano subdivision road construction started but not paved yet, Esri's older here) but others are pre-Dec 2020 (Three Corners Ranch subdivision has no house construction yet, Esri's newer here), and yet they all look visually the same? They're only about a mile apart and I can't find where the seam is. It's confusing. |