Da fehlt ja wohl Übersee :) relation/941735

Are You able to work with GitHub?

If so have a look at the instructions here. https://github.com/giggls/opencampsitemap/blob/master/README.l10n.md

I might move to a translation platform. Don’t hold your breath though.

Which translation platform would you suggest to use then?

What is the advantage of using a translation platform? It would be easy to send a notification to language maintainers on commits so this is not a problem. The problem is that I do not have language maintainers!

I will take translations to any language which is in the say Top20 of languages spoken and I would of course also take translations of languages which are spoken in nations where camping is very popular (e.g. Dutch).

However based on the mistake I made in the past I will now only take pull-requests from people who want to maintain their language support in future versions of the code.

See this file on how adding a new language works. https://github.com/giggls/opencampsitemap/blob/master/README.l10n.md

@valhikes: The red ! mean that these sites need work. See bugs tab. Often they do not even even have a name tag or have only a name tag.

Regarding “camping=designated” I am strongly against this idea because this is basically the default in many countries.

This is also the default in US-National-Parks, where the actual spots where camping is allowed are usually mapped as (mostly backcountry) campsites (node or small polygon) which does make a lot more sense than a surrounding polygon tagged “camping=designated”.

@valhikes: Jepp I think about rendering camping=no areas as something like this in OpenCampingMap. Should not be too similar to osm carto rendering of military areas though.

Hello, I am Sven, the Author of http://opencampingmap.org.

I strongly discourage mapping those places as tourism=camp_site as doing this will be a hint to do the opposite even if access=no is added.

This is even more inadequate given the fact that tourism=camp_site and access=private is valid tagging for campsites not open to the general public.

I could well imagine a new tag which I could even render on http://opencampingmap.org as prohibited area.

Was genau unterscheidet das denn von dem von Sarah mitgelieferten osm2pgsql-replication script?

Ich habe da eigentlich im wesentlichen einen systemd timer drumrum gebaut um das zyklisch laufen zu lassen.

Gruss

Sven

Just found out, that there are about 2500 sites worldwide which contain other campsites. This is bad!

I would be happy to find a few people willing to help fixing this.

I made a bug view (updated along with the https://opencampingmap.org update cycle) to help fixing these sites:

https://camping.openstreetmap.de/osmoscope/#l=https://camping.openstreetmap.de/osmoscope/campsites-inside.json

@dikkeknodel: Does not work for Campsites without name.

There seems to be a bug regarding reviews only shown after explicitely selecting the site again.

@yvecai: Site is there if you enable caravan_sites in settings.

Background is that I consider tourism=camp_site + tents=no the same as tourism=caravan_site.

As a proof that update still works here is an object that has been newly added just yesterday: https://opencampingmap.org/#15/53.0470/13.2896/4/1/bef/way/1082491129

@lyx: We are discussing a similar issue on github: https://github.com/giggls/opencampsitemap/issues/12

@yvecai: Database replication is working fine. If you provide the OSM-ID of the object you added I can have a look into the POI database.

See wiki for import guidelines:

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Imports should be discussed on the [email protected] mailing list.

Sehe ich nicht so, bin eher Team Brouter. Gibts als Webversion: http://brouter.de/brouter-web/ und als Android Routing Backend.

Hallo,

Autor von https://opencampingmap.org hier. Da ist was das Taggen des Platzes angeht ja noch Luft nach oben :)

Meine bug view meckert über die fehlenden sanitären Anlagen und die Website ist veraltet.

Wenn Du detaliertes Micromapping machen möchtest wie in der angrenzenden Kleingartenanlage, dann schau mal hier: https://opencampingmap.org/#19/48.64601/8.03543/1/1/bef/way/211554090

Gruss

Sven

Thanks.

I wonder if we should also try to establish a capacity:pitches tag as an alternative to capacity:caravans and capacity:caravans.

The rationale behind this is that there are quite a lot of sites where only the number of pitches is counted and people with tents have to use one of those as well rather than a separate tent only area.

Hm,

my bug viewer in Open Camping Map is not yet satisfied :)

https://opencampingmap.org/#18/48.90978/7.28719/1/1/bef/way/250042689

Dieser Satz ist strenggenommen falsch:

“Die Datenbank selber wird von FOSSGIS e.V. betrieben.”

Richtig wäre:

“Die Datenbank wird rechtlich von der Openstreetmap-Foundation betrieben, deren local Chapter der FOSSGIS e.V. ist.”