This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74537944 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74537719 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74537160 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74535674 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74528003 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

it certainly is not where it is now mapped, for sure (it's been randomly moved).

i prefer my life undeveloped, thank you. what does this advert copy word salad even *mean*?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74527488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74527429 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74527055 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74526092 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74524590 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74524486 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74524397 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

good middle-of-the-night, with a wonderful moon here. after one of the most amazing sunsets i spent well over an hour watching when i should have been mapping.

thanks for the update; i can confirm the area you have added is displayed viewing osm.org/#map=17/49.55191/-123.10189&layers=N .

it will take some time until it appears at all zoom levels like the default for this changeset that is a low seldom-updated zoomlevel.

in fact, viewing the link i provided and zooming out to z14 or z13, i see weirdness that i can only explain by realising at the moment i'm lacking 'net connectivity, so...

back again. cheers...

i see nowt but 141. give it time, you have old cached tiles. no problems.

martijn, ganesh, i take it as a given that all amazon edits are powered by non-public gps traces, even though it's not stated explicitly here. it's not transparent to an arbitrary osm mapper-checker and probably should be stated explicitly.

then again, the last edits i've made using aerials in p2, i've followed the general pattern of cycling through the available imageries, picking the one best meeting my needs, and promptly forgetting to provide credit. thus i would like to thank kevin for up-to-date imageries in general (offer not valid in parts of canada), mapbox for delightful aerials for much of the us of a, esri where their contributors surpass the alternatives like native z23 imagery in small bits of hawaii, bing at z20, bing at z19 preserved by esri clarity even if a decade old. and bing in canada where everyone else is years behind.

this doesn't even list more local sources, and i think i've lost the plot, but i want to give a huge thanks to all providers i've failed to credit.

or something.

first, never use google mapping products in any way for osm mapping. lose them from your source. punkt. aus.

second, changeset comments are the preferred public way to report and discuss your edits. what goes out-of-sight is invisible to me and dozens of other users who have nothing better to do than make sure you and thousands of other users actually stick to the rules.

du weisst schon, changeset comments sind öffentlich für alle? zum beispiel, https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions , wo ich habe dies entdeckt?

folgende fremdsprachische scheisse bitte ignorieren

i answer on behalf of said mapper because i know the info and have looked into how to use sentinel-2 data, deciding it is beyond me. that way said mapper can continue to contribute without being bothered by questions which here are clear with a minimum of research.

i respect the germanic tradition you uphold by a paper trail, but please do not go overboard. i am similarly defending amazon logistics from a comparable attack-as-you-were from an experienced dutch mapper.

na zdravie und prosit...

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74400503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74400355 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging