finally cleared in
changeset/65498111
after a false start.

blah.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65495641 where the changeset comment is: your spam has caused significant damage to the map due to your carelessness, so rather than correct after your comrades, i am reverting the entire changeset, and the osmf candidates who strongly disagrees can lick me. try again.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65487416 where the changeset comment is: personal home info is not to be entered into OSM

or to be even more precise, it was moved a bit, earlier, and converted into traffic signals from being a tag-less node, before the above.

what happened before that is also clear from either history link and changeset comments

if you look at the node's history, node/63975974/history , i see it was dragged from a previous position as well as given the additional tags, losing the signal details at the same time.

to visualise where it used to be, refer to
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/63975974

given `en el mundo' it appears to be deliberate; most entries look to re-tag trees=commercial tagging or delete smaller areas tagged the same, though as expected achavi barfs on memory.

there are some things later in the list that are curious, like adding a forest tag to previously untagged nodes, though

I mean, what even *is* it? There is no identifying info, so all it looks like is someone wants to scent-mark OSM without offering anything of use to anyone, except the address info that is slowly materialising here and there.
That's not the purpose of adding things to the map - they need to be generally useful.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65336884 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65336833 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

actually this didn't really work as multiple edits via the buggy gateway have layered erroneous info on this node.

manual manipulation will follow. m-m-maybe.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65336203 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65336104 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65335823 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65335626 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65335531 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65335453 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65335090 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway

Hallo RuckRunnerGRT,

Thanks for your contributions to OSM. I noticed your name when I was recovering damage caused by the Humanoid's earlier manifestation.

Is this user personally known to you? I am going to assume yes, in which case I will purposely turn a blind eye to the normally-taboo tone of your comment, as in general we like to treat co-mappers and cow-orkers with respect, regardless of whether it is earned or not.

When they turn to the dark side and deliberately damage the map, then I see no need to adhere strictly to these not-yet-set-in-stone guidelines, although so far this particular user seems to be behaving, locally, so overall it is a Win all around.

Carry on.

no worries, my revert can be reverted to make things broken again.

i lumped this together with a few other reverts where the user had thrown in the towel and asked for a revert as they were in over their head with relation issues.

that was my intent here, given that relations are not a simple concept to grok, to return this, like the others, to a clean slate and give the user a second chance, unburdened by whatever might have happened here.

your description of what went wrong does not read so much as a simple mistake, but more of a horror story of something somehow went t*tsup that should not have happened in the first place to a newbie.

of late, i have been attempting to repair broken relations, partly caused by bugs in the iD editor, and secondly where i have had to use iD and in half a dozen aborted edits, i have seen it automatically forces an edit upon me where i did not make one, do not want one, and ultimately it is *wrong* and luckily i noticed the number-of-edits counter increased when it should not have.

it is with this background that i assume any severe relation damage from an iD edit may well be an unreported bug, of which the user is unaware, or may be presented to the user without a `here be dragons' notice, after which the user may say, i don't know what i did but i didn't want to do that...

anyway, the user has a clean slate now and you are welcome to restore it as earlier, in the hope that an explanation as to what went wrong is forthcoming. or not, if it is a bug.

cheers, and sorry for this pointless rambling

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/65288696 where the changeset comment is: restore erroneously deleted 3D building part, in an attempt to keep the culprit from learning how to do the same :-) #IgnoranceIsBliss #HashtagDelight