hallo,
can you explain why you are deleting service drives such as way/565116551/history in this and similar nearby changesets?
is there some problem with the data that was added by Mapbox contracted mappers?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60188487 where the changeset comment is: restore address interpolation deleted as the only change where changeset description does not match true action. addresses have not yet been filled out as mentioned at the time of original creation.

Howdy,
Congrats on graduating from maps.me to iD. Now if we can get you addicted to Potla^H^H^H^H^H JOSM, our plans for world domination will be that much closer to fulfillment.
Your edits look fine. You corrected naming issues that caught my eye. So what remains are nit-pickings.
First, for the phone number, we prefer the international format. That is, drop the leading zero and add the country code. Which I expect might be something like +41. Or maybe +44 or +43. Actually I've no idea as I never use the phone despite having be employed by a telecom. Which is why the country code is important so the number is valid worldwide. For all I know, the +4* might be rubbish down here.
.
Being in the Alto Aldige / Suedtirol bi-lingual region, is there a distinct name:de german name? It would not surprise me if not, as even in german regions the italian restaurants are known as Trattoria.
.
A personal niggle, while it is perfectly fine, it catches me eye to see an end/closing time of 0 hours rather than 24 hours. That may be from my broadcasting background or something, but I have no problems parsing 24:00h closing time while 00:00h for some reason makes me engage my brain (to be avoided at all costs). No need to change this.
.
As far as I can see, by adding the outdoor seating, you have addressed the concern you raised in your maps.me auto-opened bug-report, which I categorised as a personal bookmark (grouping it with such contributions as `best restaurant evah') when perhaps my stock response should have been `on the map', for cases where a bug report is opened for an existing mapped object.
.
Allow me to say welcome to iD and OSM and the universe and everything, please keep on contributing, and do not let my bulk dismissal of your maps.me bug report discourage you.
Other more advanced mappers may point out issues I have overlooked as a beginner.
grazie e ciao

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60072927 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60072770 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071868 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071789 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071398 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60064598 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60062963 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info incorrectly-tagged spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60055734 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049595 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049395 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049043 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60014256 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info hotel spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60009503 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

Hallo Ad Aman T-1,
What may be printed on a physical sign will reflect a policy that transforms an official name into a shortened or abbreviated version for cost savings or brevity or modern spiffiness or whatever.
That is, these streets do not have the official and spoken name of Str or St., but if you find an official planning source where abbreviations are not used, or where common abbreviations are expanded in an appendix, assuming governments in this area work to the standards of thoroughness I expect rather than assuming the obvious, you will find the name in full.
If as you saw elsewhere, a sign-printer shop dispenses with Street or abbreviates it and you want to cater to that as well, there is a short_name or comparable tag that will allow just that.
By the way, I would prioritise the do-not-abbreviate rule over the on-the-ground rule when ordering guidelines for parsing, but that may be just me.
.
Is it just me also, or is Barn Dance Strada here a road island, with a poorly sited address node? Logically it would seem it should connect with a not-yet-drawn continuation of Bonanza Doctor bridge to the southwest...

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59980383 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam

Yes, you are absolutely correct. My trigger-happy response was due to this `newbie' mistake being repeated dozens of times in the US (and more around the world) by SEO spammers looking to get their client's names on the map, rather than honest individuals. Here the street name was not changed, which should have clued me that things were different, had I looked closely.
The revert was a quick way to restore the road back to normal, since one would have to create a new POI in any case starting anew (you can't really transfer useful tags added in error to the road to something else trivially), the idea to restore anything damaged like the name.
As nearly all I do nowadays relates to improper advertising, I too often get mistakes made by individuals mixed in with the SEO spammers who have never replied to these changeset comments, and as it's obvious from this exchange that this is decidedly not the case, and I withdraw my form-letter accusations reserved for true abusers.
As I do not see anything yet added to the map after taking a short break, nor evidence of anything being added, is there something I can do to help add the business appropriately at the correct address?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59929168 where the changeset comment is: undo deletion of private roads to allow access tagging. sorry to have missed the response while having A Real Life for a brief few days