This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60072927 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60072770 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071868 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071789 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60071398 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60064598 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60062963 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info incorrectly-tagged spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60055734 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049595 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049395 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60049043 where the changeset comment is: Restore public address info incorrectly deleted on so-called data protection grounds

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60014256 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info hotel spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60009503 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

Hallo Ad Aman T-1,
What may be printed on a physical sign will reflect a policy that transforms an official name into a shortened or abbreviated version for cost savings or brevity or modern spiffiness or whatever.
That is, these streets do not have the official and spoken name of Str or St., but if you find an official planning source where abbreviations are not used, or where common abbreviations are expanded in an appendix, assuming governments in this area work to the standards of thoroughness I expect rather than assuming the obvious, you will find the name in full.
If as you saw elsewhere, a sign-printer shop dispenses with Street or abbreviates it and you want to cater to that as well, there is a short_name or comparable tag that will allow just that.
By the way, I would prioritise the do-not-abbreviate rule over the on-the-ground rule when ordering guidelines for parsing, but that may be just me.
.
Is it just me also, or is Barn Dance Strada here a road island, with a poorly sited address node? Logically it would seem it should connect with a not-yet-drawn continuation of Bonanza Doctor bridge to the southwest...

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59980383 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam

Yes, you are absolutely correct. My trigger-happy response was due to this `newbie' mistake being repeated dozens of times in the US (and more around the world) by SEO spammers looking to get their client's names on the map, rather than honest individuals. Here the street name was not changed, which should have clued me that things were different, had I looked closely.
The revert was a quick way to restore the road back to normal, since one would have to create a new POI in any case starting anew (you can't really transfer useful tags added in error to the road to something else trivially), the idea to restore anything damaged like the name.
As nearly all I do nowadays relates to improper advertising, I too often get mistakes made by individuals mixed in with the SEO spammers who have never replied to these changeset comments, and as it's obvious from this exchange that this is decidedly not the case, and I withdraw my form-letter accusations reserved for true abusers.
As I do not see anything yet added to the map after taking a short break, nor evidence of anything being added, is there something I can do to help add the business appropriately at the correct address?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59929168 where the changeset comment is: undo deletion of private roads to allow access tagging. sorry to have missed the response while having A Real Life for a brief few days

google maps may not be used as a source for openstreetmap data. copying is absolutely not allowed.
I was ready to revert this changeset, so that the names would need to be added from an allowed source, not from google, but perhaps the DWG would prefer to redact the changeset so that the forbidden data does not appear in the history of any items?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59928550 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus park, only factual items are to be mapped, not fiction

Hallo Omnific,
as far as I can see, you have not reverted this changeset (yet) and the private drives are missing from the map.
Shall I do the revert and allow you to add access restrictions?
thanks