This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74400250 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74400149 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74400048 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74399548 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

i am unsure if the revert i am carrying out is this, but from the corner of me eye i see that *seven* of my FIXMEs in this MASSGIS-plaguged area have been castrated without my consent. i strongly object to changing MY SHOUTING. furrfu.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74399247 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74398496 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/74397879 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging

thanks jeff, i'm not sure why i was unable to grok that obvious expansion, other than i was in desperate need of sleep at the time, and well aware of it when posting. for which i am ashamed.

this was actually pointed out by the OSM inspector instance i carry out worldwide, with too many false positives. here's a simplified link to where i fell asleep before making it over to western europe:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=123.74205&lat=-3.77236&zoom=5&opacity=0.66&overlays=node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key

as i note, it needs a whitelist to exclude the accepted `to' and `pk' or `kp', i forget which, it's all french to me or army duty peeling spuds.

hi faceb00c, please enlighten me, in way/723322852 what should `im' mean?

'uf düütsch macht koi Sinn, so-there PT-53 (off-topic for this, sorry, i shall seek more punishment)

good morning, almost, depending on how you define it - the to-work commuters are flowing in the dark.

i zoomed in on your polygon around node/6777984774 where it looked sufficiently jaggy. i measured the distance to the nearby node as over 15 metres, far outside of the osm pickiness/pettiness range today, so the simplification you applied is more than i feel comfortable accepting.

more importantly, what is this you are uploading? it has no tags, and i suspect it is a boundary that may be related to the rough mapped boundary i see following it near here.

i would say, now that i have looked at it, split this into multiple pieces at the original resolution, that appears to be greater than a metre, not cm as i feared.

with 1868 nodes resulting in over a hundred text pages per change when reviewing details, i'd almost want to compromise closer to 500 where something is frequently modified, but i suspect whatever this is, that should not be the case here.

so, if your data is precise, go for the multipolygon at full resolution detail, unless this is something where it doesn't matter (yet).

\happy to help, i'm learning a lot.

i write in the language i best communicate to avoid misunderstandings and mistranslations.

same way as angela merkel makes speeches in german despite being fluent in the languages of her host countries.

i can answer

`jawohl.'

then i would not bother with the background info, as i have no desire to either entrust my words to a translation service, nor to appear a fool when after 60 hours without sleep, mein ... words-treasure ... misses ... mich.

osm does not use abbreviations. punkt. weltweit.

the exception i am aware of is sankt/saint.

if an abbreviated form is used on signage, spell it out for osm. else i will not know if ev. means there are evening services, if this is incomplete and will eventually bear the following name, or if i should expect to find protestants.

ah, good point - i see in my delayed-display scrolling (pain) that i must have missed v8. oops, sorry. `lynx' pointed out my stupidity.

i've another open query in this part of the world for the same error.

i'll have a look to make sure your change is reasonable.

thanks and sorry. again. (wanders off to seek punishment)

if you are satisfied with the detail in the simplified polygon, no need to do anything.

you are aware that if you want to keep the full level of detail, you can split the original polygon into a number of smaller sections, uploading each as outers of a multipolygon?

i would have to zoom into some closely-separated points to see what i think about the amount of detail, which varies greatly across canada from miserable to poor, and probably excellent in places.

i can't guess how many figures of cm detail you have, but if i still can't sleep again, i may look into this too.

martijn, do you have a way to determine the ages of the imageries you view? i'd expect a lag of months before the imageries open to osm go live for processing.

except sentinel-2, have you checked that?

i'm betting my last quatloos from the phrasing of the response this is amazon.

this is the first area i've actually seen any difference between the two maxar imageries, and yes, i expect the roads to be complete by now, unless work there is particularly slow. also, i suspect tagging as construction may persist well after the roads are open lacking an active local community...

i see you just joined osm yesterday, so you would be unaware of the recent controversy of expanding the use of natural=water and redefining subcategories away from landuse and the like.

my editor displays these pools without subtags as lakes. in order to be categorised as pools, they need an additional water=whatever subtag, if there is such a thing.

the principle is everything in osm should fit into a single top-level category, which as far as i know is still leisure=pool (used to be amenity= years ago).

i would not use other use of the tag as a reliable guide - there is a lot of pokémon mis-tagging about.

yo :-)
wanna try again? v3 of way/425151743/history still has `y' (not note) unless the potlatch2 bug i've seen often has re-converted it back.

or mebbe it's a plea, why oh why oh spells yo-yo.

sorry for all this...

ho,
you probably would not remember why you tagged several ways in the area of way/117200527 with the cryptic `si=B'?

a more recent addition nearby hints ti me as `so(urce)=B(ong).

biy di o hates this tiuchscreen...

hallo,
can you explain the meaning of the tag you have added to way/721878429/history ?
thanks