This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570310 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570301 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570292 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570271 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570254 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570223 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70570205 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.

are you sure about this? no aerial imagery shows any building, as this straddles the riverbanks across the river and in the Clarity imagery looks like a pile-up of logs, and in the bing imagery you used is just an overhanging tree.

please only add things that really exist to the map, and as this spot is not reachable by auto, it is hard to believe it is as described.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70540078 where the changeset comment is: this is clearly fantasy mapping based on the tags, and from aerial imageries it is obviously just part of the adjoining lake depending on water level. deleted, please only map what really exists.

Cześć!

please do not add any personal information to osm, as you have in the name field.

also, the name should be an actual name and not a description. Here there should be no name.

this applies to your nearby additions as well, `My house path'.

and also, the value you have given for elevation is wrong, as it should be a number in metres above sea level if known.

three metres height seems far too small for this type of house.

the shape of the house is poor as well; aerial imagery shows it should be a rectangle, the ESRI Clarity layer is best for this despite it being about a decade old now.

otherwise, thanks for adding to osm

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70537533 where the changeset comment is: revert re-use of node to add tagging without details and drag it and a boundary to the wrong place for both, see https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70532938 and node/99895350/history

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70521165 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions and reclassifications that are not plausible, after no mapper reply

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70521001 where the changeset comment is: revert a maps.me addition that looks suspiciously placed at the centre of the island, much like notes are placed in the centre of ways or areas and not at the wanted location, please try again

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70519684 where the changeset comment is: restore deleted military tagging

also, the ele field is wrong, a note field is to be used for communicating with other mappers rather than a description, and there is nothing to describe what this is in a machine-readable category.

if your source was not google, you should still not link to them in any way to avoid confusion - especially not in a source tag that implies legal accountability, and if it was, then i am afraid this item cannot be added to osm as is.

oba, your change lost the #5646 info, would this be something useful for a ref tagging, or is it pointless for osm?

Hallo,
In a number of recent edits over the US, you have used maps.me to create lots of unnamed highway rest areas in implausible locations.

Notes you have opened for some of these hint they are mostly addresses and others have no useful info or imply they are personal bookmarks of no use to other mappers or to osm.

Do you understand what a rest area is, or is it badly translated into french by maps.me, as i see it often misused in many countries?

I believe these changesets should be reverted, as the only useful info is contained in notes positioned at the nodes, unless some other mapper wants to convert each rest_area node into an address node and add the info from the associated note (not something i can do from the commandline unlike a revert, and which can be done from the notes contents without polluting the map with bogus rest areas).

please use address nodes for marking addresses and only use rest areas for mapping highway (such as interstate) features.

apologies for not writing in french.

merci

moin moin,
are you sure of the direction of way/623962149 and the ways it joins?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70429698 where the changeset comment is: delete maps.me spam consisting of personal and badly-placed badly-tagged bookmarks

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/70415935 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home alpine hut with personal info