This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66787325 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal airbnb castle

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66787312 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal airbnb castle

nor is it correct to name streets as per the bad changeset comments, as in way/667014214 created by the changeset prior to this.

if such a road name is not known to you, then do not try to name it with such obviously wrong information.

i have seen a *lot* of these fake names when looking around mexico in past months.

hi clifford,

i found a lonely boundary inner as sole part of a multipolygon, that lost its outer in v2, when way/38226181 below took on a life of its own for Beulah, it appears.

can you verify that the inner still belongs together with the above outer and that i did the right thing, as it's not easy to guess the grounds behind all the changesets.

relation/181707/history

thanks!

you will have to go through the object history and ask the original mappers this, as my only involvement was to bot-wrangle the restoration of well over 2'000 such ways that were deleted without providing any reason, and as you can see in the commentary in changeset/58903742 , there was no response from the mapper responsible to explain the action.

the avhavi link shows these deletions were concentrated around Bengkulu area and very far from the rest of the changes, to buildings nearly 1000km southeast.

as you can see, i have absolutely no idea if the roads were correctly categorised, nor any of the content of the changeset i reverted to avoid the loss of the work taken to put bengkulu on the map.

as the history of way/235418034/history shows, there has already been a number of category changes over time from different presumably more local mappers.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66723792 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home castle

Servus,

can i ask you to check your imported data more carefully?

just to the west of this changeset i found a tiny gap in the multipolygon outer so that now i have planted a bunch of very-fast-growing trees.

the same appears to be in this changeset with a 0,7m gap between node/5959951869 and its nearby neighbour node/5959953117 that i am about to bridge by deleting one and connecting the other.

thanks

done, save for deleting the relation as this appears not trivial with my selected editors.

for that reason i have been leaving a trail of devastation across north america upon encountering simple b0rked multipolygons, either leaving a multiple-member relation where no relationship is useful and a single polygon would suffice, or relations with a single member.

i don't know how trivial it is to automatically detect either, as i try to understand the thinking behind even bothering with a relation in the first place, as often as i see them being broken.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66552557 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal info alpine hut in a city

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66552505 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal info wilderness hut in a city

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66552465 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut in a city

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66552435 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut in the middle of a road

just as an example,
way/649112270
this is absolutely *not* the way to map missing buildings, and as is clear from the imagery, has *no* relation whatsoever to any sort of reality.

adding this sort of garbage to the map does no favours to anyone and if the entire changeset is as foreign to reality as the random example, where a single building spans the length of a street, then i suggest this changeset be reverted so that another mapper can attempt to map reality without being burdened by this fiction.

please stick to mapping real buildings and don't invent this sort of fiction.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66532272 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut private home

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66372143 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home viewpoint

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66371598 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home guesthouse

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66288909 where the changeset comment is: this is a pointless edit, the carpark is already mapped in full

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66282726 where the changeset comment is: openstreetmap should include only facts. a short autobahn through a sleepy canadian town that used to be a residential road is fiction or vandalism.

hi,
could you please be more careful with your edits?

with this changeset you have pulled and joined nodes in a manner i associate with beginners using iD.

in particular the history of node/4632403571 which is now merged into another way so that the woods has been broken for a month.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.51900&lat=44.65589&zoom=17&opacity=0.80&overlays=intersection,intersecting_segments,ways will show the damaged state that brought it to my attention.

i was going to try to fix it myself, but having already fixed a number of problems where you were the last editor, and seeing you have made multiple edits to this woods outline, i do not know if i would restore it to the state you intended. but i'm sure this present outline is not right.

also, somewhere to the west or northwest there is a carpark that will be displayed by panning the above url, that has been twisted into pretzel shape and no longer is rendered (thank goodness).

again, here you were the last editor, and JOSM edits things in a way that i cannot simply restore a different version in Potlatch, so i left a Note in the area, but so far no action has been taken. i won't try to find it now.

thanks

hallo,

with this changeset it seems you added a lot of nodes which look like a nice smooth shoreline, one of them being node/4953036254

however, while i see an outline of the shore of Russell Lake, and indeed north of this node the shoreline was in fact connected continuously, here there is no way between the isolated nodes to outline the shore.

did something go wrong here, or was something missed in error?

the reason i see this is there is a gap in the relation for Russell Lake Park at this point, and while it is so tempting to bridge the gap to the old clunky shore, i'd rather this import be carried to completion if possible.

thahks!