This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/63404892 where the changeset comment is: restore sanity out of sex spam abuse

You have deleted a well-mapped track without replacing or improving it.
Instead you have drawn a crude and rough pitch that does not reflect reality.
This is incorrect and at best, mapping for the renderer.
Why are you still using iD instead of switching to JOSM as you promised, that will allow yuo to map this track properly without needing others to fix it for you?
This is far below the standard I expect from someone with so many thousands of edits behind them, I am sorry to say.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/63248269 where the changeset comment is: cleanup rubbish

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/63248127 where the changeset comment is: destroy spam AAAARGH NUKE KILL MANGLE GRRRR

looks like you said your beddie-byes before my response, and I am soon off to remain offline with my buried-in-rubble workspace for many days, so i hope someone else will pop in to carry out the revert if you are agreeable - i'd rather not do it without your approval right before disappearing.
timezones. don'tcha hates 'em?

It is clear from a link to https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62989377 that says somewhat more, given that douchebaggery, asshattery, vandalismery, and ``creative interpretation of an enhanced reality'' can cover a wide variety of edits not limited to the Jackson Pollockery of pasta footways that carelessly draped itself over, smothering the parks.
Since someone jumping in after-the-fact probably won't have a clue how things looked beforehand, best to provide an achavi link as above in lieu of, or in addition to the thousand words it is worth, most of which words probably violate the proposed Code of Conduct (wait, didn't i see a documentary where your country had elected a President Douchebag and so the word immediately lost all offensiveness?)

you asked if it is possible to revert your deletions, which i could do for you before I lose 'net access for another week.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62994692 shows what will be lost if i do so, including your deletions of two apparently redundant hotel nodes and tweaking the tagging of a few highways, as I would revert the entire changeset, losing any additional changes/improvements as a consequence of restoring the deleted sidewalks, that you would have to repeat by hand (not a big deal, it looks like).
should i do this for you?
.
the other changesets are those a day or more earlier in your history, that do not mention sidewalks so i expected this is the only/primary one with deletions as described in your forum post.

Moin,
is this the changeset (lotsa ways deleted) you refer to in your forum Q&A post of not-too-long-ago?
The others have descriptions that seem somewhat different...
thankxzs

Moin moin,
I'm sure you know this, but a Real new mapper can be identified by iD listing how much of the tutorial or whatever that user completed before leaping into the edit.
when like here the user with only one changeset does not list any introduction, then most likely we are dealing with a new account created by a more experienced mapper. particularly when like here the telltale tags and spelling of Hours and Payments are used.
Not that what you are doing is wrong, and it is better you do this than leave things to some grizzled embittered mapper who will delete the malformed data, or Tags, or Keywords, or spammy description, when I can't be arsed to clean up after SEO spammers and lump them all into one category.
Which is why it's best to keep me away from any editor and pray my equipment doesn't improve, what with the ceiling collapsing onto my workbench last week and leaving that computer under some 10cm of highly flammable woodwormy rubbish and saucer-sized stones.
So, keep the faith.
Cheers!

there is also advice to use place=square to mark a plaza, which perhaps may fit better.
not sure about rendering though.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/62965110 where the changeset comment is: delete pointless spammage that adds nothing but duisrepute to osm

charlatan=mindreader .
how did this meaningless twaddle manage to get re-added yet again?
Updated indeed. Furrfu. Sun's not quite up and i already need another drink.

living_street is a specific european road concept that does not exist in the us, or wherever this is...

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/62962452 where the changeset comment is: undo repeated vandalism that has no place in osm

Hallo,
How is it that you have decided to change the name of the statue in node/358960258/history from Don Quixote into Qui*Y*ote?
It just looks wrong.
Thanks.

and just two days ago it was correctly re-tagged to be a private driveway:

Edited 2 days ago by andrewpmk
Version #5 · Changeset #62648285

Tags

access private
highway service
service driveway
.
there is no reason to have deleted it.
way/19400367/history

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/62708018 where the changeset comment is: certainly, as i have been resolving a constant trickle of misplaced spammy tutoring advert notes throughout singapore...

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/62507924 where the changeset comment is: sp*m *THE CONTENTS OF THIS COMMENTARY HAVE BEEN FLAGGED BY THE MANDATORY EU UPLOAD FILTER AS A POTENTIAL VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT HELD BY A THIRD PARTY AND AS AN INFRINGEMENT MAY NOT LEGALLY BE DISTRIBUTED* Updated

after suggesting it several days ago, yesterday i took a look through https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 to see if there were any topics you might have opened or participated in, to seek help in your native tongue from a vibrant and active community whom I am familiar with.
Minutes ago, still nothing.
.
You are not allowed to refer to www.hif.se as a source for OSM. And your freehand tracing from that forbidden source is very inaccurate; further, I do not see any separated building parts as in the OSM data now.
Your traces appear to be about six metres away from their correct position where I checked.

Google maps or aerials however cannot be used in any way in contributing to OSM.
.
stadiaarcadia, I cannot understand why despite my commentary in the note located here, now resolved, as well as in other locations, where I refer specifically to Duke by name and gave you tips to avoid beginners' mistakes, you ignore what I write.
This does not match with your claims of having visited hundreds of stadiums, yet failing to be familiar enough with them to get the mapping correct.
What you have added here is wrong and misaligned as can be seen clearly without even needing to refer to Google in any way, Upload Filter or no.
What you seem to be doing is a massive and low-quality mapping action, combined with spamming, having again today opened hundreds (or at least many dozens) of worldwide notes, all identical, when it would suffice to take the feedback you have received on one or two, and avoiding the spamming activity you were called out for both on the mailing lists, and over the months in notes.
As one of the few who tries to keep notes useful and free of spam of all types, I am decidedly not amused.