This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59745413 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59741382 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59738835 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me misc shelter spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59737803 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59737753 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59736041 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59720647 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me wilderness hut spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59720598 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me alpine hut spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59720589 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me alpine hut spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59718943 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59717140 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info spam

Just to note, the user's last changeset was in Jan of 2016, closer to this changeset than to today.
I don't feel like manually checking all 6918 `Point' nodes to see if any differ from the pattern of those I did check. Should I prepare to revert and if so, how long should I wait?
I suspect if there is additional data for these points, it will be easier to upload afresh, if the user is still active.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59693975 where the changeset comment is: Restore dragged node in an iD editing session that seems to have done nothing else.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59689012 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me shelter personal info spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59674798 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me attraction spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59674604 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59674585 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/59673524 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me misplaced attraction

Grüezi dikke,
I've noticed you have been busy with a number of mappers who are the victims of maps.me, not just obvious from the changeset tags, but the `Updated a wasauchimmer' changeset comment. (To me it is obvious from your descriptions of the problems, before looking at the details, the problems are so common...)
I appreciate your efforts, but be aware -- if you are not already -- many maps.me users never respond to or see your comments, and the way maps.me seems to handle languages in name and name:lang does not match the osm-carto rendering, leading to unnamed amenities.
Further, I don't know if maps.me gives its users access to enough name (or other) details to be able to correct things to match OSM conventions.
As such I'd encourage the user to graduate from Einsteigerdroge maps.me into something a bit more powerful and capable, particularly if you know the problems are an inherent limitation of maps.me.
Which is probably too much for the typical maps.me user, after whom I've been cleaning these past days.
Just a random observation...
Groetjes

Hallo Ko(n?)styantyn, thanks for replying.
Please note that OpenStreetMap also places great value on the Open part, both in being open to communication, as well as being about about how one works, including sources.
The changeset comment allows you up to 255 characters, and I often use most of them in explaining what I do in excessive detail.
To help with the communication, I also suggest you make use of the OSM Notes in the areas where you work, to see if people are asking questions about the work you have done.
I will mention a recently-re-opened note, note/1331247#map=19/37.77797/-122.22198&layers=N , which is an area in California where one of your cow-orkers, Irina if my memory serves, has made quite a few errors.
This is correctly re-activated by another of your team, because while the user Adam Ant attempted to fix this, his quick solution created a road island.
I cannot really see from Mapbox aerial imagery how all the autos get where they are, but I suspect it is under tree cover and fairly easy to see.
.
When working in an area, you should always look at all the available imageries to see which is newest, although this will take some time and it is only valid working in one particular place. I can say that DigitalGlobe Standard is the newest in the California location because I had to delete some work your team had done there, leaving the note open.
If it is possible, open a smaller window in your editor with a different imagery. I know I can do this in Potlatch2, with clean and detailed Mapbox backgrounds in the main editing window, and the floating window having what I suspect is the newest, so that it is clear when the two imageries do not match.
.
You are encouraged to open a Note when it is not clear what is correct in any location, or if you have questions. That is a way that other mappers, such as myself, can communicate and help.
Remember, most mappers will want to help you to do good work, and want to be sure your team makes no mistakes.
There is no guarantee someone will see and reply to the note, but I try to keep a regular eye on them and have been happy to help both the Telenav and Microsoft teams recently in addition to any other mapper with questions.
.
About your second account, I am sure Andy can help with that. But many mappers have multiple accounts for different roles in OSM. If you use your latinish Constantium for your paid work, but your Witcher_UA account for personal non-work activity, there is no problem. I have seen this often with the Telenav team, but there the names are close enough to be clear of the connection..
.
Again, do not hesitate to try to communicate in changeset comments and through Notes, and always remember the Open in OpenStreetMap.
thanks
Openbeer