fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156057876 | over 1 year ago | Hi, industrial=domes doesn't seem to be a documented tag, and is this name actually signed there or is it just descriptive?
|
| 156057968 | over 1 year ago | Hi, the name should be capitalised correctly, not all caps.
|
| 156057942 | over 1 year ago | Hi, this looks like it should be squared off by pressing Q in iD or JOSM, and the way should only cover the car wash area itself, not the driveway. It also shouldn't be tagged as building=yes since it's not a building. The name should also be capitalised correctly too.
|
| 156058683 | over 1 year ago | Hi, name should not be used for descriptive purposes, and a few of these definitely seem like they're tagged incorrectly.
|
| 156058789 | over 1 year ago | Hi, is barrier=field_boundary a valid tag at all? Doesn't seem to be mentioned in the wiki, I think this probably should be tagged differently.
|
| 156058990 | over 1 year ago | Hi, the operator should just be Nyrstar (not all caps too), the capacity should just be a number, not 100+, and the surface should just be asphalt or concrete. You also should square off the larger parking area by pressing Q in iD or JOSM.
|
| 156059092 | over 1 year ago | Hi, building=yes should only be tagged if the way includes only the building itself.
|
| 156064677 | over 1 year ago | Hi, as mentioned in 156065180, was there any discussion before this automated edit? |
| 155953974 | over 1 year ago | I've been slowly working on bits and pieces of this, absolutely amazing effort on smashing this out!
|
| 155632453 | over 1 year ago | Not a problem! |
| 155632453 | over 1 year ago | I've changed it to segregated=no as there's no visible segregation between walking and cycling users that I can see on aerial imagery or from past walking in that area, please let me know and correct me if it has recently changed though.
|
| 155759799 | over 1 year ago | Hi, the way you've changed isn't a road, it's a way used as part of administrative boundaries. |
| 155698004 | over 1 year ago | Reverted changeset to restore service=alley tags |
| 155698004 | over 1 year ago | Not a problem, the wiki is a great place to check out different tags, service=alley covers this one. |
| 155698004 | over 1 year ago | Hi, service=alley just indicates the type of service road they are, from the looks of aerial imagery, these would all likely be considered alleys.
|
| 155673716 | over 1 year ago | I've reverted this, there isn't a second road showing in aerial imagery |
| 155673716 | over 1 year ago | Hi, is there a reason why you've changed this cycleway to an unclassified road in a changeset named test? This is not a test environment.
|
| 155635636 | over 1 year ago | All good! Just wanted to check since the building only had a house number before.
|
| 155635636 | over 1 year ago | Hi, is the whole building Unit 4?
|
| 155632453 | over 1 year ago | Hey, is way/1308275843 actually segregated? I don't think there's separation between walking and cycling along there
|