OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
155577728 over 1 year ago

Thanks for catching and fixing my typo!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155577728

155226119 over 1 year ago

Do these two trails meet up at the end, or are there two separate trails that run side by side in close proximity?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155226119

154999689 over 1 year ago

Hey, these aren't parks, they should be tagged as sports pitches, and drawn more accurately
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154999689

154658202 over 1 year ago

I'm not sure is sports centre is the best tag for this, I'd probably take tourism=Sports out, but landuse=recreation_ground is either more appropriate, or should be replaced by something else, since it's closer to a park that contains several facilities, some being sports.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154658202

154039755 over 1 year ago

If you keep social_facility, that is

154039755 over 1 year ago

social_facility=office isn't very common, is there possibly a better value under office= that could work for this?
They also cover disability support, so social_facility:for=senior;disability would be best I'd say
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154039755

153999575 over 1 year ago

I reckon the garden centre bit on their website is more along the lines of "we have a gardening and plants area", even though there isn't a huge amount compared to other stores.

153999575 over 1 year ago

Hey, good work on updating these, I've been meaning to do some work on some of these!

Couple of questions, is Stratco really a garden centre, DIY would suit it better I would have thought, especially the Gawler/Willaston store.
And I don't think the fresha.com link is really right for the website tag, maybe website:booking is more appropriate, what do you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153999575

153776297 over 1 year ago

Hi, do we have permission to use that information? According to the document itself, it's under copyright so we'd need explicit permission to use it in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153776297

153503763 over 1 year ago

Hi, roundabouts should not have names unless the roundabout itself specifically has a name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153503763

153503693 over 1 year ago

Hi, is this road actually called/signed as Munno Para Boulevard? It shouldn't carry the name just because it spurs off from it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153503693

152922212 over 1 year ago

Hi there, access=no means nobody is allowed there. If this is private property, access=private or potentially access=customers (if appropriate) would probably be better suited.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152922212

152532258 over 1 year ago

This isn't the location of Rydges Pit Lane, and it's already mapped in the correct location. I've removed this as a result.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152532258

152563508 over 1 year ago

This is clearly a pool and not a pond.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152563508

152519314 over 1 year ago

Are these all signed with the name "Paraglider launch", or is that just a descriptive name that should be removed/moved to description?

152357076 over 1 year ago

If it's private it should be access=private, not acecss=no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152357076

151920377 over 1 year ago

Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920377

151920395 over 1 year ago

Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920395

152183270 over 1 year ago

Hey, pretty sure these crossings aren't uncontrolled since there'd be signals there at the traffic lights.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152183270

150947514 over 1 year ago

Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well.

changeset/151603042