Just for the sake of clarity, junction=yes clearly states that junction=yes *should not* be used on junction nodes being shared by roads without any further properties.

Hi, you've requested a review, can you please explain what you've changed considering you've only left "gg" as a comment and have made a change across multiple countries?

I'd have to agree with ouchjars, the protected cycle lane does continue on into the northern most section of Frome Street, it doesn't just suddenly end.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149891968

I reckon way/1271382924 should just be removed, there's already a landuse=residential area that covers this area.

Hi, as per my comment on 150053524, link roads generally don't have names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150054004

Hi there, link roads usually don't have a name associated with them, one option is destination:street to tag the road they're leading to.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150053524

I've restored this in changeset/150035252 since AIBTE just removed it in a future changeset instead of actually moving it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150028581

I'll just mention the reviewed_bad from OSMCHA was another user, it just seems to add that to any comment added from there once that's been set by any user.

Discussion needs to occur before changes, and since there's been no actual community consensus on using DataSA for road classifications, and no bylaws actually provided to use, the previous classification is reasonable, and based on regularly driving through here, more appropriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149827902

Since the wiki page for junction=yes does explicitly say these nodes are incorrectly tagged, I do plan to re-revert these nodes, unless someone can provide a reason not to.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149827539

And they should be tagged as leisure=swimming_pool (as well as access=private for private ones), not natural=water.

Hi, private swimming pools should not be named, and name= is not for descriptive names.

This has already been reverted, discussion is occurring at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/renewables-energy-project-source/111664

You appear to have accidentally removed a node from way/331092501, and then added it back in as part of changeset/149854604

Hi, you've got a wetland relation (relation/10108830) that contains a water way (way/731004638). This is conflicting information, can you confirm which is the correct one and either remove the water tags from the way or remove the way from the relation?

Hi there, you've added a fairly large line as a generator, this seems incorrect, can you please review and fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149856682

Hey there, where you've got the school and kindergarten next to each other, you can use the same nodes where their borders meet to make it cleaner.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149847964

The wiki says that junction=yes by itself is pointless, it doesn't indicate anything. Tagging junction=yes means just as much as the bare node itself.

If you want to indicate directions, you need more than that, which is what a manoeuvre relation can be used for. Without having information about which ways are actually joined, how can any kind of routing algorithm know what is actually meant?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149827539

Hi there, https://victoriancollections.net.au is copywrited, do we have permission to use information from there as a source?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149807470

Hey there, do you know what data SAPPA maps uses for their road names? I can't see any licensing information in their system. It might be coming from DataSA's Roads dataset (which we have a waiver to cover the CC 4.0 BY parts we can't comply with), but unless we're 100% sure then we can't use that source.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149716956