I reckon this should just be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634217

Hey, when adding houses and other buildings you'll usually want to press Q in iD and JOSM to square them off, and as I mentioned in your other changeset, adding addr:suburb is redundant if addr:city exists, and both of those are redundant in AU since we can reverse geocode for suburbs, states and postcodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149460663

Hey there, if you press Q it'll square off a closed way to 90 degree corners, these are all a little wonky so doing that will neaten them up!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149460388

Hey there, for the southern carparks, is wheelchair=no the best tag to have on there? I'd probably recommend removing that tag instead of just inverting it if there's no disabled parking (from memory there is) and it isn't exactly somewhere where wheelchairs can't go, which is what wheelchair=no is intended for (i.e. somewhere only accessible by stairs).

For the houses, they're already tagged with addr:city so addr:suburb is a double up, plus tagging suburbs, postcodes and states in Australia is redundant since it can be obtained through respective relations (pretty much 100% coverage on all 3 across AU).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149461367

Considering the roads placement within a smaller, close to country town, those factors are less important in determining a roads classification. If you actually took into consideration the roads use, positioning, compared it to other roads nearby, and even just observed those roads, they’d be more than a tertiary road. They’re the main roads connecting the town to highways, main roads northbound out of the town, and also the heavy vehicle route out of the town.

Are you able to explain why you’ve dropped the main road out of a town from primary to tertiary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149252903

Thanks for catching that, fixed in changeset/149222216

Hey, is this actually a full residential road or just a driveway to a couple of houses?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148528867

changeset/148413816 has added it back in.

Aerial and on the street imagery made it seem like it's a left hand turn only. I'll add it back in.

There was an extra node added to way/43393192, and two buildings added to an island in Western Australia. Doesn't look like it needs reverting.

Hi, is the road actually named this (highly unlikely for a driveway)? If not, the name should be left empty, and the correct name should be placed on the main object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148338644

Hi, the Trinity College South name should be put on the school area at large, not a specific building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148248498

Hi, the Trinity College North name should be put on the school area at large, not a specific building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148248508

Hi, if you're creating a driveway, it should also be tagged with service=driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148248762

Hi there, we generally avoid SEO like descriptions on OSM, plus the tracking query tags on the website should be removed. I've made those changes for you.
Also, grades and phone have specific formats, I've fixed those as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148248738

And yeah, definitely better to revert to the previous one if you're not sure, pretty sure that's been the consensus so far with these ones.

I'll see if I can take a detour and drive that way at some point, or see if we've got any street level imagery. It's kind of a feeder road, but also could be slow enough that residential fits better. Definitely not secondary though!

I reckon Crittenden Road could possibly be classed as tertiary, but Coventry Road looks good to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148232861

Hi, this should be tagged as a service road, not a residential road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148229656