Revert undiscussed automated edit

changeset/157646853

Absolutely good food for thought, but it’s the kind of thing that needs community feedback first, or to be done on a one by one basis by reviewing aerial imagery, and confirming that other data (I.e. the route relations) isn’t where the fault actually is

And looking at that forum post, busway=designated isn’t an access tag, you’ve replaced non-accesss tagging with access tagging, removing information to satisfy a QA tool, I think this changeset should be reverted.

Hi, has this automated edit followed any of the guidelines, a forum post with 5 hours notice, that’s not even on the main OSM forum, isn’t how you propose an automated edit.

PTV's GTFS feed and Vicmap Transport (both permitted data sources) have it as Wattle Glen.

Also, has the old building actually been demolished?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157603476

Hi, this doesn't look to be valid for amenity=college. College in a name doesn't inherently make it amenity=college.

Hi, same as the primary school, amenity=school, and no building tag. It also overlaps the primary school, these should be separate and touching at most, not overlapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157601976

Hi, you've included a portion of the road in the school boundary, as well as set the entire area to be a building. It should be tagged as amenity=school, with no building tag, and the way should be separate from the roads
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157601931

Hi there, you shouldn't add a descriptive name like Shelter to objects
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157561771

Hi and welcome to OSM, please try and make multiple changes per changeset, otherwise it gets very hard to perform QA and reviews in the areas you edit. I'd add a bunch of landuse ways in one area and then save. Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157473223

Reverting mapping for the renderer

changeset/157401777

Hi, that's still incorrect, not all maps render the same as osm.org. If a map is showing something incorrectly, please let the developer of that map know. Carto (the style on OSM) isn't designed for end users, it's primarily designed for mapper feedback.

Hi there, are you removing the dunes so they don't show on the map? If so, that's mapping for the renderer and should be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157381859

Hi, is this actually a football pitch? Converting it to an area should only be done if you can clearly see where the pitch is in person or via aerial imagery, one doesn't show on the imagery listed as used in your changeset. It's also not shaped like a football pitch, this should be reverted and left for someone to confirm in person, maybe by adding a note or a fixme= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157395051

Hi, is this actually a football pitch? Converting it to an area should only be done if you can clearly see where the pitch is in person or via aerial imagery, one doesn't show on the imagery listed as used in your changeset. It's also not shaped like a football pitch, this should be reverted and left for someone to confirm in person, maybe by adding a note or a fixme= tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157395072

Hi, is this actually a football pitch? Converting it to an area should only be done if you can clearly see where the pitch is in person or via aerial imagery, one doesn't show on the imagery listed as used in your changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157395125

Perfect, thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157292021

Hey, are you sure those tag suggestions are correct? That Wikidata ID matches the operator.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157292021

Hi, amenity=kindergarten and amenity=childcare do somewhat conflict, it might be best to do a landuse tag for way/1318782424 and then set the correct one on the building. I also am questioning the changes to Callitris Reserve, but if it's definitely just the small section that's fine, just seems odd from a QA perspective having been there for over 10 years.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157169188