Found reference source: https://www.tallinn.ee/et/lahepea

For future reference, used overpass query
[out:json][timeout:180];(nwr (85, -180, 90, 180););out body;>;out skel qt;

And projection EPSG:3995

Käisin kontrollimas, jah 11772485033 ülekäigu juures ei ole kindlasti foore (pilt note/5031437). Muudetud changeset/174032147

Ok, thanks for clarifying. Edu õpingutega.

Ignore the last request, i was informed this was EKA Architecture students' homework.

thanks

Hi, I'm curious if you are affiliated with users Ralftora and PiretS, who have also started mapping parking spaces this week?

Hi, looks like you have turned entire Lilleküla into single parking space. It has been already reverted, but please explain why.

Tere, Piret. Kui sa tead, et oled parasjagu samas piirkonnas midagi muutmas, siis ei ole mõtet iga paari minuti tagant muudatusi eraldi changesetina üles laadida, vaid lisa need ühe suurema üleslaadimisena. iD värvib üleslaadimise nupu punaseks, kui oleks aeg muudatused üles laadida.

Thanks for asking. I used Bing's imagery to trace building outline from presumable building foundations and pathways from Esri layer.

Hi, you have changed this pedestrian crossing traffic light to be regular traffic light (traffic_signals=*) while i couldn't reliably verify which type of signals those are, i'd like to point out that you have also reversed the direction signals are facing to (traffic_signals:direction=*). I assume this is purely accidental change as everydoor doesn't have any indicator to help guess, which way the underlying way is drawn.

PS. Since i don't remember traffic lights being here, does this crossing really have signals now?

Tere, ega sa ei mäleta, kas node/11772485033 on tõesti fooridega ülekäik? Ma pole sealtkaudu ammu liikunud, aga enda teada ma ei mäleta et seal nagu foorid oleks. Küsin sellepärast, kuna üks kasutaja tegi kahtlase muudatuse, et foor paikneb peale ülekäifurada.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you absolutely sure this building's walls are made of metal, because that's what building:material=metal means. You may have wanted to add roof:material=metal, which means roof is made of metal.
Also, if you are making changes within single contained area, then it's recommended to put multiple changes into single changeset - meaning you don't have to press yellow arrow every time it appears, only when you have finished editing or feel so. Everydoor will offer you to download data when it deems it necessary.
PS. Seems like you are conducting an organized edit, make sure to disclose that fact on your profile page.

Hi, Please make sure you provide explanation to changesets. This one is spanning 3 countries due to tiny change in way/648202691, while majority of changes seem to be adding buildings near Peterburg.

Difference from yesterday's changeset/167754914 is that this time i included nodes that were not part of any crossing-way. Overpass query:

[out:json][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:Helsinki}}->.searchArea;
// Step 1: Get all kerb nodes with only one tag
node[kerb][kerb!=no](if:count_tags()==1)(area.searchArea)->.kerbs;
// Step 2: Get motorvehicle roads and their nodes
way[highway][highway!~"footway|cycleway|path"](area.searchArea);
node(w)->.road_nodes;

// Step 3: Remove kerbs that are part of those roads
(.kerbs; - .road_nodes;)->.nonroad_kerbs;

// Step 6: Intersect with nonroad_kerbs
node.nonroad_kerbs->._;
out geom meta;

For future reference, here’s the Overpass QL I used to select those kerb=* nodes. First, it limits to nodes tagged only with kerb=* (so we don’t touch kerb tags used alongside bus stops or platforms) - this follows the advice in wiki (kerb=*#By_itself). Then, since tagging a node as barrier=kerb implies it’s an obstacle along a way, we explicitly exclude any kerb nodes that lie on motor-vehicle roads (i.e. all highway=* except footway, cycleway, path), because according to wiki standalone kerb=* may have denoted informal crossing.

[out:json][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:Helsinki}}->.searchArea;
// Step 1: Get all kerb nodes with only one tag
node[kerb](if:count_tags()==1)(area.searchArea)->.kerbs;
// Step 2: Get motorvehicle roads and their nodes
way[highway][highway!~"footway|cycleway|path"](area.searchArea);
node(w)->.road_nodes;
// Step 3: Remove kerbs that are part of those roads
(.kerbs; - .road_nodes;)->.nonroad_kerbs;
// Step 4: Get crossing ways
way[footway=crossing](area.searchArea)->.foot_crossings;
way[cycleway=crossing](area.searchArea)->.cycle_crossings;
(.foot_crossings; .cycle_crossings;)->.crossing_ways;
// Step 5: Get nodes used in crossing ways
node(w.crossing_ways)->.crossing_nodes;
// Step 6: Intersect with nonroad_kerbs
node.nonroad_kerbs.crossing_nodes->._;
out geom meta;

Pretty sure there was bicycle parking at one entrance, but not at another. Bit further away from entrance than cart storage.
Looking at mapillary it seems like I've misplaced the node as it should be closer to NE corner on handicapped parking. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.419488608892&lng=24.762347247475&z=17&pKey=295881068672651&focus=photo&x=0.17658996465528115&y=0.5474598750641052&zoom=2.1171493936689756&menu=false

Hi,
They seem to be selling products made of thin film of plastic (called "kile" in estonian). Judging by product selection on website, it's specialized on construction materials (such as steam barriers), gardening supplies (garden bed covers and greenhouse material) and various packaging and wrapping products (different kinds of plastic bags). They do offer some textile products as well (for gardening and construction).
Feel free to change it to more appropriate tag. I'm afraid that DIY shop might not be appropriate as these kind of products are more oriented towards professional construction/maintenance segment, not hobbyists.

For future reference, linking the block message because it contains links to some of Aulo's (user id 417306) changesets and their discussions:
osm.org/user_blocks/6403

Thanks. I wanted to report Aulo's actions to talk-ee month ago, but got overloaded by non-OSM-related stuff.
Could you also please take a look at crossings? Because at some point i noticed how Aulo had converted a lot of crossing=traffic_signals into marked crossings. If you are busy, removing the crossing types would be sufficient, i can reclassify them in SC.